TABLE 3.
Performance scores for qualitative resultsa
| Performance score | No. of resultsb
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panel 1
|
Panel 2
|
|||||
| Qualitative (n = 20) | Quantitative (n = 37) | Total (n = 57) | Qualitative (n = 25) | Quantitative (n = 47) | Total (n = 72) | |
| Good, 8 | 10 | 17 | 27 (47) | 15 | 22 | 37 (51) |
| Adequate, 7 | 7 | 10 | 17 (30) | 5 | 7 | 12 (17) |
| Mediocre, 6 | 3 | 8 | 11 (19) | 1 | 0 | 1 (1) |
| Poor, <6 | 0 | 2 | 2 (4) | 4 | 18 | 22 (31) |
a
Data for qualitative and quantitative data sets were combined for qualitative analysis.
b
For panel 1, the percentage of results with scores of good plus adequate was 77.2%. For panel 2, the percentage of results with scores of good plus adequate was 68.1%.
c
Values in parentheses are percentages.