Table 6.
Animal | Group 1 |
Group 2 |
Group 3 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control |
Treated with F7 nanoemulsion |
Treated with conventional cream |
||||
Erythema | Edema | Erythema | Edema | Erythema | Edema | |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Average | 0 | 0 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.4 |
Group 1 was the control group, Group 2 animals were treated with nanoemulsion formulation F7, and group 3 animals were treated with conventional commercial cream (Lamisil). The numbers in the erythema scale are following: 0 none, 1 slight, 2 well defined, 3 moderate, 4 scar formation. In the edema scale the numbers are: 0 none, 1 slight, 2 well defined, 3 moderate, 4 severe.