Table 3.
The risk of IR according to tertiles of evaluated variables.
| Variables | ORs (95% CI) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | P Value | Model 2 | P Value | Model 3 | P Value | |
| TG/HDL-C | ||||||
| T1 | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| T2 | 2.35 (1.15–4.81) | .019 | 1.56 (0.72–3.39) | .263 | 1.57 (0.72–3.46) | .261 |
| T3 | 10.19 (5.31–19.58) | <.001 | 6.15 (2.98–12.65) | <.001 | 6.08 (2.90–12.73) | <.001 |
| P value for trend | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | |||
| TyG | ||||||
| T1 | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| T2 | 5.09 (2.18–11.89) | <.001 | 4.20 (1.71–10.29) | .002 | 4.06 (1.64–10.04) | .002 |
| T3 | 17.97 (8.01–40.35) | <.001 | 13.04 (5.46–31.11) | <.001 | 12.20 (5.04–29.56) | <.001 |
| P value for trend | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | |||
| VAI | ||||||
| T1 | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| T2 | 3.77 (1.74–8.18) | .001 | 2.48 (1.09–5.61) | .029 | 2.17 (0.93–5.05) | .073 |
| T3 | 13.53 (6.52–28.06) | <.001 | 6.67 (3.08–14.41) | <.001 | 6.80 (2.95–15.68) | <.001 |
| P value for trend | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | |||
| LAP | ||||||
| T1 | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| T2 | 3.05 (1.38–6.72) | .006 | 1.56 (0.68–3.59) | .293 | 1.49 (0.63–3.54) | .357 |
| T3 | 15.08 (7.28–31.25) | <.001 | 5.37 (2.43–11.84) | <.001 | 4.84 (2.08–11.27) | <.001 |
| P value for trend | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | |||
Note: Model 1 unadjusted. Model 2 adjusted for age and BMI for VAI and LAP, added sex for TG/HDL-C and TyG. Model 3 adjusted for age, BMI, WC, SBP, current smoker, current drinker, educational attainment, physical activity level, per capita income and history of diabetes for VAI and LAP, added sex further for TG/HDL-C and TyG.
OR: odds ratios; CI: confidence interval. TyG: triglycerides/glucose index; TG/HDL-C: triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio; VAI: visceral adiposity index; LAP: lipid accumulation product.