Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;54(1):622–632. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2039956

Table 5.

Comparison of predictive accuracy and cut-off values of TG/HDL-C, VAI, LAP, and TyG by age and sex for the total sample.

  AUC (95% CI) p Value Sensitivity Specificity Cut-off Youden Index
Overall
 LAP 0.806 (0.763–0.850)b-c 0.696 0.804 48.70 0.500
 TyG 0.800 (0.757–0.844)b-c <.628 0.765 0.692 8.76 0.457
 TG/HDL-C 0.773 (0.737–0.807)a <.001 0.765 0.678 2.68 0.446
 VAI 0.767 (0.721–0.813)a <.001 0.661 0.764 2.41 0.427
Age <48
 LAP 0.811 (0.761–0.854)b-c 0.667 0.846 48.70 0.513
 TyG 0.807 (0.765–0.845)b-c .760 0.804 0.643 8.62 0.447
 TG/HDL-C 0.775 (0.722–0.821)a .043 0.706 0.722 2.71 0.455
 VAI 0.771 (0.718–0.818)a .047 0.608 0.817 2.54 0.450
Age ≥48
 LAP 0.794 (0.741–0.840)b-c 0.719 0.765 49.64 0.484
 TyG 0.785 (0.732–0.832)b-c .549 0.828 0.648 8.75 0.476
 TG/HDL-C 0.760 (0.705–0.806)a .015 0.750 0.700 2.87 0.449
 VAI 0.752 (0.697–0.802)a .010 0.828 0.601 2.08 0.429
Men
 LAP 0.773 (0.728–0.814)b-c 0.729 0.747 48.70 0.476
 TyG 0.763 (0.718–0.805)b-c .494 0.729 0.677 8.87 0.406
 TG/HDL-C 0.732 (0.685–0.775)a .004 0.718 0.703 3.11 0.421
 VAI 0.735 (0.688–0.778)a .004 0.729 0.673 2.54 0.403
Women
 LAP 0.873 (0.816–0.917) 0.900 0.688 29.25 0.588
 TyG 0.877 (0.821–0.921)b-c .854 0.933 0.695 8.50 0.628
 TG/HDL-C 0.855 (0.795–0.902) .334 0.900 0.714 2.00 0.614
 VAI 0.855 (0.796–0.902) .131 0.900 0.682 1.08 0.582

Note: a indicates a significant difference compared with TyG; b indicates a significant difference compared with TG/HDL-C; c indicates a significant difference compared with VAI.

P values are calculated by the nonparametric approach to compare AUC of other evaluated variables with LAP.

TG/HDL-C: triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio; TyG: triglycerides/glucose index; VAI: visceral adiposity index; LAP: lipid accumulation product; AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, respectively.