Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 26;3:672446. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.672446

TABLE 6.

Overall pooled prevalence of specific and system-specific congenital anomalies.

Anomaly Type* N % (95%CI)
Manuscripts Cases At Risk
Not defined 8 49 13,372 0.34% (0.04, 0.82)
Cleft lip and/or palate 8 111 205,537 0.03% (0.01, 0.05)
Neural tube defects and/or Hydrocephalus 3 182 153,535 0.11% (0.08, 0.14)
Cardiovascular 3 8 3,502 0.23% (0.01, 0.65)
Polydactyly and Syndactyly 6 43 4,668 0.70% (0.30, 1.22)
Musculoskeletal 5 14 5,855 0.20% (0.07, 0.38)
Umbilical and Inguinal Hernia 4 79 3,609 1.73% (0.40, 3.81)
Esophageal, gastrointestinal, or anorectal 3 47 182,745 0.02% (0.0, 0.07)
Genitourinary 2 8 2,662 0.23% (0.06, 0.48)
Trisomy 3 3 4,850 0.05% (0.05, 0.15)
Multiple systems 1 10 2,365 0.42% (0.20, 0.78)
Other§ 6 123 130,916 0.40% (0.06, 0.98)
*

Congenital anomalies were grouped into subtypes by common types (ex: neural tube defects) and by system (ex: musculoskeletal). A subgroup was created when there was more than one reported case or study reporting the type/system of the anomaly. When multiple anomalies were listed per infant, the infant was included as one overall infant but was included as a case in each of the anomalies sub-types. If specific anomalies were not specified, such infants were included in the “multiple systems” sub-group. Naevus/birthmarks were excluded when possible for the overall and type specific analyses.

Including talipes equinovarus.

Systems not defined.

§

Includes singular, or infrequent, reports of rare or non-specific anomalies that did not fit well into other defined sub-groups. Examples include natal tooth, anophthalmia, facial asymmetry, arachnoid cyst, hypopigmented skin, macrocephaly with brain defect, subtle dysmorphism, and plagiocephaly.