Table 1.

Statistical table 1

#	Figure	Description	Data structure	Type of test	Statistical values	Significance	Effect size
1	1D, left	Valence	Normality not assumed	One-way Friedman’s test	χ2 = 38.000	p < 0.001	-
2	1D, left	Valence (neu vs pos)	Normality not assumed	Post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test	Z = −2.803	p corrected = 0.051	r = −0.886
3		Valence (neu vs ero)			Z = −2.803	p corrected = 0.051	r = −0.886
4		Valence (neu vs mut)			Z = 2.803	p corrected = 0.046	r = 0.886
5		Valence (neu vs hor)			Z = 2.803	p corrected = 0.041	r = 0.886
6		Valence (pos vs ero)			Z = 1.886	p corrected = 0.119	r = 0.596
7		Valence (pos vs mut)			Z = 2.803	p corrected = 0.035	r = 0.886
8		Valence (pos vs hor)			Z = 2.803	p corrected = 0.030	r = 0.886
9		Valence (ero vs mut)			Z = 2.803	p corrected = 0.025	r = 0.886
10		Valence (ero vs hor)			Z = 2.803	p corrected = 0.020	r = 0.886
11		Valence (mut vs hor)			Z = −1.580	p corrected = 0.119	r = −0.500
12	1D, right	Arousal	Normality not assumed	One-way Friedman’s test	χ2 = 29.760	p < 0.001	-
13	1D, right	Arousal (neu vs pos)	Normality not assumed	Post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test	Z = −2.803	p corrected = 0.051	r = −0.886
14		Arousal (neu vs ero)			Z = −2.803	p corrected = 0.051	r = −0.886
15		Arousal (neu vs mut)			Z = −2.803	p corrected = 0.046	r = −0.886
16		Arousal (neu vs hor)			Z = −2.803	p corrected = 0.041	r = −0.886
17		Arousal (pos vs ero)			Z = −2.192	p corrected = 0.124	r = −0.693
18		Arousal (pos vs mut)			Z = −2.497	p corrected = 0.075	r = −0.790
19		Arousal (pos vs hor)			Z = −2.244	p corrected = 0.124	r = −0.710
20		Arousal (ero vs mut)			Z = −1.478	p corrected = 0.418	r = −0.467
21		Arousal (ero vs hor)			Z = −1.172	p corrected = 0.482	r = −0.371
22		Arousal (mut vs hor)			Z = 0.459	p corrected = 0.647	r = 0.145