Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;45:102170. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102170

Table 2.

Average connectedness table.

Brazil China EMU India Russia South Africa UK US MCI FROM
Brazil 74.4 1.7 7.6 5.4 5.8 6.8 5 4.9 1.1 38.1
China 3.2 74.5 7.3 7 5.6 5.5 4.2 4.1 1.2 38
EMU 4 1.8 44.2 8.4 7.4 15.3 22.1 8.7 0.6 68.3
India 3.8 3.9 12.1 57.9 8.2 10.7 8.5 6.4 1 54.6
Russia 3.1 0.7 11.6 7.3 60.7 13.6 9.1 1.6 4.9 51.8
South Africa 4.1 2.5 17.9 8.6 10.7 48.2 13.4 4.8 2.4 64.3
UK 2.1 1.2 25.4 6.1 5.6 12.6 48.5 10.3 0.8 64
US 4.4 2.5 14.9 5.1 1.1 5.6 13.7 63.1 2.1 49.4
MCI 0.1 0.5 0.3 0 1.3 0.1 0.2 0.6 109.4 3.1
Contribution TO others 24.8 14.8 97 47.8 45.7 70.2 76.1 41.2 14.1 431.7
NET directional connectedness −13.3 −23.2 28.6 −6.8 −6.1 5.8 12.1 −8.1 11.1 TCI: 35.5

Notes: The results are based on a TVP-VAR model with a lag length of order one and a 10 step-ahead generalised forecast error variance decomposition and estimated using the following equations:.

TOjt=i=1,ijkθ˜ij,tg(H) (5).

FROMjt=i=1,ijkθ˜ji,tg(H) (6).

NETjt =  TOjt − FROMjt (7).

TCIt=k1J=1kTOjtk1J=1kFROMjt (8).

TOjt in Eq. (5) represents a shock to all variables, known as the total directional connectedness to others while FROMjt in Eq. (6) represents a shock from all variables, known as the total directional connectedness from others. NETjt in Eq. (7) measures the net directional connectedness to indicate whether it is a net transmitter or net receiver. TCIt in Eq. (8) is a total connectedness index.