Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;21:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.003

Table 1.

Quantitative assessment: median (inter-quartile range) Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD) and proportion (95% CI) of correctly labeled vertebrae. The sequential approach outperformed the combined approach during the external validation.

Sequential approach Combined approach p
Internal validation
 DSC (%)
  Thoracic vertebrae 96.1 (95.0–96.9) 96.2 (95.0–97.0) 0.003
  Lumbar vertebrae 97.6 (97.3–97.9) 97.6 (97.1–97.9) 0.004
  All vertebrae 96.7 (95.5–97.4) 96.7 (95.4–97.4) 0.13
 HD (mm)
 Thoracic vertebrae 3.7 (2.8–5.4) 4.1 (2.8–5.8) 0.45
  Lumbar vertebrae 3.2 (2.4–4.0) 3.0 (2.2–4.2) 0.72
  All vertebrae 3.6 (2.8–5.1) 3.6 (2.4–5.7) 0.66
 Labeling (%)
  All vertebrae 90.7 (88.3–93.1) 91.6 (89.3–93.8)



External validation
 DSC (%)
  Thoracic vertebrae 93.4 (90.7–94.8) 93.9 (88.9–95.1) 0.09
  Lumbar vertebrae 96.0 (95.0–96.4) 95.4 (92.8–96.1) <0.001
  All vertebrae 94.5 (91.8–95.8) 94.4 (91.4–95.5) <0.001
 HD (mm)
  Thoracic vertebrae 4.6 (3.6–5.9) 7.1 (3.6–21.3) <0.001
  Lumbar vertebrae 4.0 (3.2–6.1) 7.2 (4.0–12.4) <0.001
  All vertebrae 4.5 (3.4–6.0) 7.1 (3.7–15.1) <0.001
 Labeling (%)
  All vertebrae 79.6 (74.0–85.2) 55.7 (48.9–62.6)