Table 4.
Overall strength of the evidence.
| Outcome | Studies (observations), n | Summary of findings | Consistency, directness, and precision | Limitations (including reporting bias) | Overall strength of evidence | Applicability |
| Weight | 5 [1,2,29-31] (689) | Increased weight loss noted in all intervention groups but significant in only 3 studies. One high-quality study [30] (n=371) reported a significant difference in weight change between participants in the intervention and those in the control group | Consistent, indirect, and precise | Two studies had a high risk of bias for nonblinding of study personnel, participants, and outcome assessors. One study had a high risk of bias for incomplete data | Moderate | African American and Hispanic adults with obesity or morbid obesity, who are young and middle-aged adults, and have access to a mobile phone |
| Hemoglobin A1c | 3 [1,12,28] (380) | Improvement in hemoglobin A1c in the intervention groups but only significant in one study | Consistent, indirect, and imprecise | Studies had a high risk of bias from the nonblinding of study personnel and participants. One study also had a high risk of bias from the nonblinding of outcome assessors and the other study had an unclear risk of bias for the same | Low | African American or Hispanic adults with poorly controlled diabetes and access to a mobile phone |