Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 4;8(2):e25890. doi: 10.2196/25890

Table 4.

Overall strength of the evidence.

Outcome Studies (observations), n Summary of findings Consistency, directness, and precision Limitations (including reporting bias) Overall strength of evidence Applicability
Weight 5 [1,2,29-31] (689) Increased weight loss noted in all intervention groups but significant in only 3 studies. One high-quality study [30] (n=371) reported a significant difference in weight change between participants in the intervention and those in the control group Consistent, indirect, and precise Two studies had a high risk of bias for nonblinding of study personnel, participants, and outcome assessors. One study had a high risk of bias for incomplete data Moderate African American and Hispanic adults with obesity or morbid obesity, who are young and middle-aged adults, and have access to a mobile phone
Hemoglobin A1c 3 [1,12,28] (380) Improvement in hemoglobin A1c in the intervention groups but only significant in one study Consistent, indirect, and imprecise Studies had a high risk of bias from the nonblinding of study personnel and participants. One study also had a high risk of bias from the nonblinding of outcome assessors and the other study had an unclear risk of bias for the same Low African American or Hispanic adults with poorly controlled diabetes and access to a mobile phone