Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Shock. 2021 Mar 1;55(3):316–320. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001635

Table 2.

Comparison of viscoelastic parameters, labs, and incidence of VTE between patients who did and did not demonstrate fibrinolysis shutdown on ROTEM testing

Fibrinolysis shutdown Non-fibrinolysis shutdown P
n 11 (44%) 14 (56%)
d-dimer level (ng/mL) 5,215 (2,21, 6,925) 1,431 (1,159, 1,429) 0.1080
Platelet count (103/mL) 288 (217, 394) 294 (231, 387) 0.9568
EXTEM CT (s) 90 (63, 107) 80 (66, 93) 0.9567
EXTEM MCF (mm) 78 (72, 81) 76.5 (74, 79) 0.9783
FIBTEM MCF (mm) 45 (39, 52) 43 (41, 50) 0.9136
EXTEM ML (%) 1.0, (1.0, 2.0) 4.5 (4.0, 6.0) 0.0003
Patients with VTE 8 (73%) 1 (7%) 0.0021

P values based upon Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Data presented as median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile) or number (%).The d-dimer and platelet count values were those obtained immediately preceding the ROTEM by up to 24 h.

CT indicates clot time; MCF maximum clot firmness; ML, maximum lysis; VTE, venous thromboembolic.