Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 19;22:71. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02143-x

Table 2.

Multivariable regression models for objective assessment and TDM performance in the 12 weeks prior to therapy change (either dose change or discontinuation)

At least one objective assessmenta TDM performed
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
Sex (female vs. male) 0.849 0.565–1.274 0.4283 1.480 0.929–2.361 0.0993
Race (white vs. nonwhite) 0.657 0.330–1.306 0.2305 1.152 0.540–2.456 0.7147
Age at therapy change (years) 1.004 0.989–1.019 0.6215 0.996 0.979–1.013 0.6164
Previous biologic use (yes vs. no) 1.027 0.639–1.652 0.9120 0.980 0.5840–1.642 0.9378
Disease duration at therapy change (years) 0.987 0.964–1.011 0.2896 0.997 0.969–1.025 0.8133
Site type (academic vs. community) 1.588 1.010–2.495 0.0452 1.114 0.662–1.875 0.6845
Private insurance at enrollment (yes vs. no) 1.044 0.602–1.811 0.8781 1.188 0.626–2.253 0.5979
Drug classb 0.0083
 Adalimumab Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Infliximab 0.569 0.360–0.900 0.0159 0.844 0.529–1.348 0.4779
 Other anti-TNF 1.460 0.576–3.705 0.4252
 Ustekinumab 0.353 0.137–0.914 0.0320
 Vedolizumab 1.359 0.683–2.702 0.3819
Disease type (CD vs. UC) 1.181 0.734–1.901 0.4923 0.953 0.567–1.602 0.8566
Therapy change (discontinuation vs. dose change) 1.178 0.776–1.788 0.4417 1.011 0.634–1.613 0.9632

aObjective assessment included fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, endoscopy, MRI, or CT scan

bFor TDM model, drug class compared infliximab to adalimumab (reference) as these were the only two biologics included in the TDM assessment population