Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 19;17:104. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02980-2

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study cohort Study region Study Design Patients(I/C) Sex(M/F) Age (years) Follow-up (months) Location Culture Results Intervention Local complications Other Adverse Events Outcomes MINORS
Humm, 2014 [31] UK Retrospective outcome study 21/NA 18/3 49 (28–88) 16 (6–25) 21 tibia 4 Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, 4 Polymicrobial, 3 Negative, 6 Other organisms Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate 7 aseptic wound leakage, 5 pin-tract infection a transient acute kidney injury Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 8
Andreacchio, 2019 [32] France Retrospective outcome study 12/NA 8/4 10.3 (2–15) 24–72 3 tibia,4 femur, 2 humerus,1 clavicle,1radius,1 IV Metatarsal 3 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 7 Negative (other NS) Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate None None Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 9
Ferguson, 2014 [33] UK Retrospective outcome study 193(195 locations)/NA 150/43 46.1 (16.1–82) 44.44 (15.6–85.2) 88 tibia, 73 femur, 10 humerus, 6 ankle, 5 radius, 4 knee fusion, 4 pelvis, 3 calcaneum, 1 ulna, 1 forefoot 49 Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 10 Coagulase-negative staphylococci, 7 Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Escherichia coli, 4 Enterobacter cloacae (other NS) Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate 30 aseptic wound leakage, 9 collection of fluid and 9 refracture 7 death (other reason) Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 13
McKee, 2002 [15] Canada Prospective outcome study 25/NA 15/10 43 (27–69) 28 (20–38) 8 tibia, 6 femur, 3 ulna, 1 humerus 9 Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 4 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2 Enterobacter cloacae, other polymicrobial infections Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate 8 aseptic wound leakage, 3 refracture, 2 persistent nonunion, 1 superficial wound necrosis, 1 hypertrophic nonunion NR Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 9
Gitelis, 2002 [34] USA Retrospective outcome study 6/NA 3/3 50 (26–85) 28 (18–40) 3 tibia, 3 femur 5 Staphylococcus aureus, 1 Polymicrobial infections Debridement, tobramycin-impregnated calcium sulfate None NR Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 8
Qin, 2020 [30] China Retrospective outcome study 33/NA 26/7 44.5 (17–67) 35.9 (12–75) 33 calcaneum 8 Staphylococcus aureus,6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2 Enterococcus faecalis, 2 Proteus mirabilis,2 Enterobacter cloacae,10 negative (other NS) Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate 13 aseptic wound leakage 1 death (cardiovascular disease) Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 7
Ferrando, 2017 [35] Spain Retrospective comparative study 13/12 9/4 48 (17–67) 22 (16–29) 6 tibia, 4 calcaneum, 2 femur, 1 humerus 5 methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 2 Methicillin-resistant S.aureus, 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Streptococcus agalactis,1 Escherichia coli,1 Polymicrobial infections Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate 1 hematoma,1 mild seroma None Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 15
Badie, 2019 [36] Egypt Prospective outcome study 30/NA 25/5 26.2 (17–53)  > 12 14 tibia, 11 femur, 2 radius, 2 humerus, 1 ulna 15 S. aureus, 3 methicillin resistant S. aureus, 2 Klebsiella Pneumoniae, 2 Escherichia coli, 2 Proteus mirabilis, 1 Salmonella, 1 Streptococcus, 2 polymicrobial infections, 2 negative Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate 1 refracture NR Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate 11
Jiang, 2020 [23] China Retrospective outcome study 34/NA 27/7 41 (3–67) 26 (12–68) 34 calcaneum 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2 Enterobacter cloacae, 2 Staphylococcus aureus (other NS) Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate 11 aseptic wound leakage 1 death (other reason) Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 9
Zhou, 2020 [37] China Retrospective outcome study 42(43 locations)/NA 24/18 43.7 (23–74) 42.8 (12.8–77.5) 24 left tibia, 19 right tibia 11 Staphylococcus aureus, 3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 Polymicrobial infections Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate 13 paseptic wound leakage, 4 slight pain after a long-distance walk, 4 limb weakness or discomfort, 1 slight claudication NR Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 8
Qin, 2018 [29] China Retrospective comparative study 35/NA 26/9 38 (18–60) 33.7 (25 ~ 41) 35 tibia 15 Staphylococcus aureus, 5 Escherichia Coli, 3 Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, 2 Serratia Marcescens, 2 Acinetobacter Baumannii, 2 Klebsiella Pneumoniae, other negative Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate 8 pin-tract infection, 3 knee stiffness None Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 7
Gramlich, 2017 [38] Gemany Retrospective outcome study 93/NA 59/34 62 (11–84) 11 (6–22) 35 femur, 28 tibia, 7 fibula, 5 humerus, 5 hip joint, 4 Radius, 3 talus,, 3 pelvis (other NS) 27 Staphylococcus aureus, 19 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 Escherichia coli, 3 Klebsiella Pneumoniae (other NS) Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate NR NR Eradication rate 6
Ruan, 2021 [39] China Retrospective outcome study 35/NA 25/10 54 (34–82) 24–60 35 tibia 4 Staphylococcus aureus, 2 Klebsiella Pneumoniae, 2 Streptococcus Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate 5 anterolateral numbness of the iliac thigh, 2 relapse, 2 hematocele in the iliac bone area, 1 nonunion, 1 aseptic exudate NR Eradication rate, reoperation rate, refracture rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 10
Gauland, 2011 [25] USA Retrospective outcome study 323/NA NR NR 60 Lower-Extremity (NS) NR Debridement, vancomycin and gentamicin-impregnated calcium sulfate NR NR Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 8
Sun, 2017 [40] China Retrospective outcome study 12/NA 7/5 54 (16–72) 10.8 (6–18) 12 jaw 3 Staphylococcus aureus, 2 β-hemolytic streptococcu, 1 Escherichia coli, 1 Streptococcus viridans (other NS) Debridement, vancomycin-impregnated calcium sulfate 2 aseptic wound leakage None Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 7
Zhao, 2020 [41] China Retrospective comparative study 10/21 10/0 48 (28.98–67.42) 21.7 (15.8–27.6) 5 femur, 5 tibia 4 Staphylococcus aureus, 4 Negative (other NS) Debridement, vancomycin-impregnated calcium sulfate 3 aseptic wound leakage None Eradication rate, reoperation rate, delayed healing rate, rate of aseptic wound leakage 14

NR, not reported; NS, not specified