. 2022 Feb 20:1–9. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02874-w

Table 4.

Hierarchical regression results for the effects of coping strategy patterns (N = 1,673)

	Model I	Model II
Constant	3.32 (.79)^***	3.87 (.79)^***
Gender (ref: male)	-.29 (.13)^*	-.11 (.13)
Age	.09 (.03)^**	.10 (.03)^**
Education (ref: undergraduate)	-.48 (.21)^*	-.49 (.21)^*
Self-rated health	-.17 (.08)^*	-.11 (.08)
Neighborhood SES	.16 (.07)^*	.15 (.06)^*
Class 2 vs. Class 1		-1.18 (.21)^***
Class 3 vs. Class 1		-1.40 (.19)^***
Class 4 vs. Class 1		-1.80 (.21)^***
R² adjusted	.010^***	.054^***

The dependent variable is stigmatizing attitude. The reference group is Class 1 (i.e., the emotional coping group). ^*p < .05; ^**p < .01; ^***p < .001