Table 2.
p values | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary productivity | Dist. closest neighbour | Mean altitude | Rodent index | K | AICc | ΔAICc | AICcWt | LL | Cum. Wt | |
(A) Peak Phase | ||||||||||
Specific model | 0.013 | 0.057 | 0.058 | 0.57 | 6 | 63.68 | 0.00 | 0.74 | − 24.86 | 0.74 |
Constant | 3 | 65.82 | 2.14 | 0.26 | − 29.65 | 1.00 | ||||
(B) Decrease phase | ||||||||||
Constant | 3 | 32.44 | 0.00 | 0.99 | − 12.37 | 0.99 | ||||
Specific model | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 6 | 41.30 | 8.85 | 0.01 | − 10.83 | 1.00 |
Based on data solely from (a) peak year and (b) decrease year of the small rodent cycle. The model of the peak phase performed better than the constant reference model (ΔAICc > 2). The decrease phase model did not perform better than the constant reference model, and we found no relationships explaining the occurrence of complex families