Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 3;198(2):381–392. doi: 10.1007/s00442-022-05107-w

Table 2.

Specific models, explaining group-living in a Scandinavian Arctic fox population

p values
Primary productivity Dist. closest neighbour Mean altitude Rodent index K AICc ΔAICc AICcWt LL Cum. Wt
(A) Peak Phase
 Specific model 0.013 0.057 0.058 0.57 6 63.68 0.00 0.74 − 24.86 0.74
 Constant 3 65.82 2.14 0.26 − 29.65 1.00
(B) Decrease phase
 Constant 3 32.44 0.00 0.99 − 12.37 0.99
 Specific model 0.44 0.35 0.90 0.83 6 41.30 8.85 0.01 − 10.83 1.00

Based on data solely from (a) peak year and (b) decrease year of the small rodent cycle. The model of the peak phase performed better than the constant reference model (ΔAICc > 2). The decrease phase model did not perform better than the constant reference model, and we found no relationships explaining the occurrence of complex families