Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 7;13:809482. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.809482

TABLE 2.

Similarity evaluation of different flower head samples of chrysanthemum samples.

No. Accessions Similarity No. Accessions Similarity No. Accessions Similarity
JH-01 Gongju 0.835 JH-11 Hang-baiju 0.903 JH-21 Boju 0.640
JH-02 Gongju 0.840 JH-12 Hang-baiju 0.917 JH-22 Boju 0.665
JH-03 Gongju 0.808 JH-13 Taiju 0.921 JH-23 Boju 0.956
JH-04 Gongju 0.827 JH-14 Taiju 0.807 JH-24 Boju 0.679
JH-05 Gongju 0.848 JH-15 Taiju 0.941 JH-25 Huaiju 0.909
JH-06 Gongju 0.831 JH-16 Taiju 0.845 JH-26 Huaiju 0.897
JH-07 Hang-baiju 0.931 JH-17 Taiju 0.952 JH-27 Huaiju 0.839
JH-08 Hang-baiju 0.932 JH-18 Taiju 0.946 JH-28 Huaiju 0.823
JH-09 Hang-baiju 0.923 JH-19 Boju 0.811 JH-29 Huaiju 0.923
JH-10 Hang-baiju 0.931 JH-20 Boju 0.681 JH-30 Huaiju 0.911