MSCs for drug delivery |
Easily performed in culture |
Short cell life after engraftment |
|
GMP grade existing drugs more readily available |
Drug effects on stem cell itself |
|
|
Not possible to load all drugs |
|
|
Required short interval between loading and administration |
Anti-microbial enhancement |
Allows specific targeting of identified pathogens |
Of less relevance outside infectious disease |
Licensing strategies |
Rely on endogenous mechanisms |
Full licensing environment difficult to recreate |
|
Proven cryopreservation compatibility |
|
Hypoxia priming |
Enhances cell proliferation during manufacture as well as efficacy |
Requires specific manufacturing equipment |
Differentiation prior to engraftment |
|
Can be long and difficult manufacturing process |
Gene modifications |
A wide range of possible therapeutic proteins can be expressed |
Unpredictable effects of transgene on stem cell |
|
|
Risk of stem cell mutagenesis with some vector options |
Small molecule priming |
Inexpensive and simple methodology |
Possible off-target effects on MSC |
|
Wide availability of GMP compounds |
|
EV enhancement |
Increased safety / lower immunogenicity due to no cell involved |
Heterogeneity within EV batches due to culturing and isolation methods |
|
Easier storage and delivery of therapeutic |
Large scale production still problematic |