Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 21.
Published in final edited form as: Law Hum Behav. 2019 Apr 18;43(3):250–262. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000327

Table 3.

Pooled Logistic Regression Predicting Gun Violence

Full model: Model 1a Hostility removed: Model 1b Hostility and ND removed: Model 1c
Measure OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Individual factors
Hostility .85 .67–1.07
Poor future orientation 1.45** 1.13–1.85 1.45*** 1.17–1.79 1.46*** 1.19–1.79
Alcohol use .92 .73–1.14 1.01 .83–1.70 1.02 .84–1.21
Personal rewards for crime 1.42** 1.11–1.82 1.37** 1.11–1.70 1.25** 1.01–1.54
Sociocontextual factors
Time in ungainful activity 1.47** 1.16–1.86 1.37** 1.10–1.72 1.38** 1.10–1.71
Neighborhood disadvantage (ND) 1.10 .88–1.39 1.17 .96–1.44
Witness nongun violence 2.63*** 2.07–3.34 2.31*** 1.86–2.86 2.27*** 1.86–2.78
Victimization nongun violence 1.36* 1.10–1.67 1.29** 1.07–1.56 1.26** 1.05–1.51
Gang involvement 1.16 .74–1.83 1.05 .69–1.83 1.08 .73–1.59

Note. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.