Table 2.
Author Country |
Intervention (program/service/policy) | Brief description | Method of evaluation | Findings related to out-of-pocket expenses |
Béland et al.60 Canada |
Community-based multidisciplinary teams | Provision of community-based multidisciplinary integrated care | RCT | No difference was found for out-of-pocket expenditures between control and intervention groups |
Dosman and Keating61 Canada |
Program | Provision of high-level care for individuals in a home-like environment | Focus groups | Costs incurred for caregivers included insurance payments, safety equipment, and maintenance/repair expenses |
Flood et al.65 UK |
Program | Community assessments provided by social workers and occupational therapists | Cost comparison | Costs for participants assessed by social workers were higher; however, the difference was significant only to caregivers |
Leutz et al.47 US |
Social HMO program | Provision of community-based care services | Qualitative interviews | Some people were found to have expenses beyond program coverage (eg, home care, yard work) Described additional out-of-pocket payments associated with the program that varied according to need |
Meng et al.48 US |
Voucher program | Vouchers used to reimburse personal assistance expenditures | Quantitative survey data | Intervention group had higher expenditures, and those with higher functional impairment had higher service usage |
Moon et al.49 US |
Policy | Description of financial implications of older adults’ complex health needs | Policy analysis | Older people with complex needs have higher out-of-pocket expenses Describes proposed complex care option for Medicare |
Parker and Hill82 UK |
Program | Home-based and day hospital rehabilitation | RCT | Cost analysis found no significant difference between total costs of intervention and control groups |
Schwab et al.54 US |
Social HMO program | Provision of community-based care services | Gathering actual costs | Average annual estimated costs of services were found to be US$4900 out-of-pocket No comparison with group who received social HMO |
Stuart and Hansen72 Denmark |
Policy | Description of care services for older people with frailty in Denmark | Policy analysis | Description of how public services and family caregivers cooperate to provide care Note that some out-of-pocket expenses occurred; however, overall sources provided adequate support |
HMO, health maintenance organization; RCT, randomized controlled trial.