Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 21.
Published in final edited form as: ACM CHIL 2021 (2021). 2021 Apr;2021:146–153. doi: 10.1145/3450439.3451879

Table 1:

Single and multi objective optimization performance comparison on the penalized logP task. For the single one, MolDQN results are from [44], and the scores of other baselines are from [21]. The reported scores of the multi objective optimization task is a success rate. CMG outperforms the baselines in both of the two tasks.

Single Obj. Opt. Multi Obj. Opt.
Method Improvement Diversity All Samples Sub Samples
MMPA 3.29 ± 1.12 0.496 - -
JT-VAE 1.03 ± 1.39 - - -
GCPN 2.49 ± 1.30 - - -
VSeq2Seq 3.37 ± 1.75 0.471 - -
MolDQN 3.37 ± 1.62 - - 0.00%
VJTNN 3.55 ± 1.67 0.480 3.56% 4.00%
CMG 3.92 ± 1.88 0.545 6.98% 6.00%