Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;34(2):146–152. doi: 10.1589/jpts.34.146

Table 2. Comparison between two groups for each factor.

Characteristic No exercise behavior With exercise behavior
(n=26) (n=17)
Physical factors
IPAQ, METs∙min/week 333.5 [0–4,380] 960 [0–5,760]
6MWD, m 300 [40–540] 390 [120–560]
WIQ score, Point
Pain 25 [0–100] 50 [0–100]
Distance 28 [7–100] 34 [6–100]
Speed 31 [0–100] 33 [3–89]
Steps 37.5 [0–100] 62 [8–100]
Total 136.5 [10–400] 200 [31–389]

Individual factors, point
Subjective health 3 [1–4] 4 [1–5]*
Exercise SE 8 [4–17] 11 [6–19]*
Re-SE 3 [1–5] 4 [2–5]

Environmental factors, n (%)
Working 13 (50) 3 (18)*
Ownership of the field 8 (31) 11 (65)
Car ownership 10 (38) 7 (41)

*p<0.05.

Median [Max–Min].

IPAQ: International physical activity questionnaire; 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; WIQ: Walking impairment questionnaire; Exercise SE: Exercise self-efficacy; Re-SE: Recovery self-efficacy; Exercise SE: The answers were based on the five-option method—1, I do not think so at all; 2, I do not think so much; 3, Either no; 4, I think so a little; 5, I think so a lot—and the higher the score, the higher the exercise SE.