Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 8;9:726276. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.726276

Table 6.

Effects of dietary probiotic mixture supplementation on plasma biochemical parameters of sows.

Items Day postpartum CON group BS-A+B group BS-A+BL group BS-B+BL group P-values
ALB (g/L) 1 41.76 ± 0.63a 42.39 ± 0.83a 43.68 ± 0.43a 39.05 ± 1.26b 0.01
21 41.05 ± 0.72 41.16 ± 0.82 41.14 ± 0.88 41.23 ± 1.19 0.99
ALP (U/L) 1 49.88 ± 2.39a 38.50 ± 1.92b 42.38 ± 2.19ab 47.75 ± 4.55a 0.04
21 37.88 ± 2.66 44.88 ± 6.26 38.63 ± 2.67 44.63 ± 3.58 0.47
AMM (μmol/L) 1 123.34 ± 4.40a 74.89 ± 6.69b 62.10 ± 6.66b 107.64 ± 3.35a <0.01
21 93.73 ± 1.45a 52.00 ± 2.06b 58.53 ± 3.84b 59.26 ± 7.20b <0.01
HDL-C (mmol/L) 1 0.64 ± 0.03 0.63 ± 0.03 0.62 ± 0.03 0.71 ± 0.03 0.16
21 0.72 ± 0.04b 0.91 ± 0.06a 0.72 ± 0.04b 0.95 ± 0.04a <0.01
LDL-C (mmol/L) 1 0.80 ± 0.06 0.86 ± 0.07 0.81 ± 0.04 0.80 ± 0.03 0.83
21 1.10 ± 0.13 1.19 ± 0.05 0.96 ± 0.08 1.08 ± 0.05 0.31
TC (mmol/L) 1 1.41 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.09 1.35 ± 0.04 1.47 ± 0.05 0.67
21 1.82 ± 0.11 2.02 ± 0.09 1.63 ± 0.11 1.91 ± 0.07 0.06
TG (mmol/L) 1 0.28 ± 0.03 0.23 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.04 0.74
21 0.19 ± 0.03 0.21 ± 0.03 0.17 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.02 0.27
TP (g/L) 1 67.85 ± 1.00b 70.15 ± 0.99ab 70.45 ± 0.63ab 73.40 ± 1.65a 0.02
21 75.66 ± 1.42 78.83 ± 1.61 76.79 ± 2.02 82.33 ± 1.82 0.06
UN (mmol/L) 1 4.19 ± 0.30 4.54 ± 0.16 5.35 ± 0.30 4.69 ± 0.35 0.06
21 4.83 ± 0.19 5.88 ± 0.54 5.65 ± 0.65 5.79 ± 0.32 0.37

Data are presented as means with SE (n = 8).

a, b

Mean values in the same row with different superscripts were significantly different (P < 0.05). The BS-A+B, BS-A+BL, and BS-B+BL groups contained 125 g/t Bacillus subtilis A (BS-A), 125 g/t Bacillus subtilis B (BS-B), and/or 125 g/t Bacillus licheniformis (BL), respectively.

ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AMM, ammonia; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TP, total protein; UN, urea nitrogen.