Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 8;10:588269. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.588269

Table 2.

Summary of studies reviewing the outcome of universal testing and the prevalence of asymptomatic pregnant women with positive SARS-CoV-2.

No First Author Country Title Universally tested pregnant women N COVID-19 Infection Study design RoB
Negative n (%) Positive
Total n (%) Asymptomatic n (%) Symptomatic n (%)
1 Prabhu et al. (11) United States (New York) Pregnancy and postpartum outcomes in a universally tested population for SARS-CoV-2 in New York City: a prospective cohort study 675 605 (89.6) 70 (10.4) 55 (78.6) 15 (21.4) Prospective cohort ++
2 Fassett et al. (12) United States (Los Angeles) Universal SARS-CoV-2 screening in women admitted for delivery in a large managed care organization 3,923 3,906 (99.6) 17 (0.4) 17 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Retrospective cohort +
3 Vintzileos et al. (13) United States (New York) Screening all pregnant women admitted to labor and delivery for the virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 161 129 (81.1) 32 (19.9) 21 (65.6) 11 (34.4) Retrospective cohort ++
4 Campbell et al. (14) United States (New York) Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among patients admitted for childbirth in Southern Connecticut 770 740 (96.1) 30 (3.9) 22 (73.3) 8 (26.7) Retrospective cohort +
5 LaCourse et al. (15) United States (Washington) Low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among pregnant and postpartum patients with universal screening in Seattle, Washington 188a 182 (97.3) 5 (2.7) 1 (20.0) 4 (80.0) Retrospective cohort ++
6 Miller et al. (16) United States (Chicago) Clinical implications of universal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in pregnancy 635 612 (96.4) 23 (3.6) 10 (43.5) 13 (56.5) Research letter ++
7 London et al. (17) United States (New York) The relationship between status at presentation and outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19 75 65 (86.7) 10 (13.3) 10 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Retrospective cohort ++
8 Goldfarb et al. (18) United States (Boston) Universal SARS-CoV-2 testing on admission to the labor and delivery unit: low prevalence among asymptomatic obstetric patients 757 737 (97.4) 20 (2.6) 9 (45.0) 11 (55.0) Retrospective cohort +
9 Ochiai et al. (19) Japan Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic obstetric patients in Tokyo, Japan 52 49 (94.2) 3 (5.8) 3 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Retrospective cohort ++
10 Bianco et al. (20) United States (New York) Testing of patients and support persons for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection before scheduled deliveries 155 131 (84.5) 24 (15.5) 24 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Retrospective cohort ++
11 Ferrazzi et al. (21) Italy SARS-CoV-2 infection testing at delivery: a clinical and epidemiological priority 1,566 1,517 (96.9) 49 (3.1) 27 (55.1) 22 (44.9) Retrospective cohort +
12 Herraiz et al. (22) Spain (Madrid) Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 before labor admission during COVID-19 pandemic in Madrid 203a 199 (99.0) 2 (1.0) 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) Retrospective cohort ++
13 Sutton et al. (23) United States (New York) Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery 215a 181 (84.7) 33 (15.3) 29 (87.9) 4 (12.1) Research letter +++
14 Gagliardi et al. (24) Italy (Tuscany and Liguria) Universal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing of pregnant women admitted for delivery in 2 Italian regions 533 530 (99.4) 3 (0.6) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3) Research letter ++
15 Yassa et al. (25) Turkey Outcomes of universal SARS-CoV-2 testing program in pregnant women admitted to hospital and the adjuvant role of lung ultrasound in screening: a prospective cohort study 296 273 (92.2) 23 (7.8) 12 (52.2) 11 (47.8) Retrospective cohort ++
16 Berkowitz et al. (26) United States (Ohio) Implementation of universal testing for SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women with intended admission for delivery 518b 482 (98.1) 10 (1.9) 7 (70.0) 3 (30.0) Research letter +++
17 Santos et al. (27) Portugal Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic pregnant women and their partners in a tertiary care hospital in Portugal 428 426 (99.5) 2 (0.5) 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Research letter +++
18 Abeysuriya et al. (28) United Kingdom Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women at term admitted to an East London maternity unit 180c 171 (96.1) 7 (3.9) 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) Retrospective cohort ++
19 Buckley et al. (29) United States (New York) Universal testing of patients and their support persons for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 when presenting for admission to labor and delivery at Mount Sinai Health System 307 257 (83.7) 50 (16.3) 50 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Research letter +++
20 Doria et al. (30) Portugal COVID-19 during pregnancy: a case series from an universally tested population from the north of Portugal 103 91 (88.4) 12 (11.6) 11 (91.7) 1 (8.3) Case series +++
21 Bender et al. (31) United States (Pennsylvania) Universal testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in 2 Philadelphia hospitals: carrier prevalence and symptom development over 2 weeks 318 310 (97.5) 8 (2.5) 8 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Retrospective cohort +++
22 Vinuela et al. (32) (2020) Spain (Madrid) SARS-CoV-2 screening of asymptomatic women admitted for delivery must be performed with a combination of microbiological techniques: an observational study 100 91 (91.0) 9 (9.0) 9 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Retrospective cohort +++
23 Tanacan et al. (33) Turkey (Ankara) The rate of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in asymptomatic pregnant women admitted to hospital for delivery: experience of a pandemic center in Turkey 206 203 (98.5) 3 (1.5) 3 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Prospective cohort +++
24 Saviron-Cornudella et al. (34) Spain (Madrid) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) universal screening in gravids during labor and delivery 266 260 (97.7) 6 (2.3) 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) Retrospective cohort ++
25 Reale et al. (35) United States (Massachusetts) Patient characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in parturients admitted for labor and delivery in Massachusetts during the spring 2020 surge: a prospective cohort study 2,945 2,852 (96.8) 93 (3.2) 80 (86.0) 13 (14.0) Prospective cohort +
26 Pineles et al. (36) United States (Texas) Racial-ethnic disparities and pregnancy outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infection in a universally-tested cohort in Houston, Texas 935 858 (91.8) 77 (8.2) 66 (85.7) 11 (14.3) Retrospective cohort ++
27 Naqvi et al. (37) United States (Los Angeles) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) universal testing experience on a Los Angeles labor and delivery unit 82 81 (98.8) 1 (1.2) 0l (0.0) 1 (100.0) Prospective cohort ++
28 Mei-Dan et al. (38) Canada (Toronto) Questionnaire-based vs universal PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery 446 442 (99.1) 4 (0.9) 3 (66.7) 1 (33.3) Prospective cohort +
29 Maru et al. (39) United States (New York) Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women at Elmhurst Hospital Center, Queens, New York 124 78 (62.9) 46 (37.1) 33 (71.7) 13 (28.3) Retrospective cohort ++
30 Hcini et al. (40) French Guiana Maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of large series of SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnancies in peripartum period: a single-center prospective comparative study 507 370 (73.0) 137 (27.0) 103 (75.2) 34 (24.8) Prospective cohort +
31 Figueiredo et al. (41) Portugal (Porto) Systematic screening for SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women admitted for delivery in a Portuguese maternity 184 173 (99.9) 11 (0.1) 9 (81.8) 2 (18.2) Prospective cohort +
32 Waghmare et al. (42) India (Maharashtra) Universal screening identifies asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 among pregnant women in India 1,140 999 (87.6) 141 (12.4) 284 (73.8) 37 (26.2) Prospective cohort ++
33 Diaz-Corvillon et al. (43) Chile Routine screening for SARS CoV-2 in unselected pregnant women at delivery 583 546 (93.7) 37 (6.3) 16 (43.2) 21 (56.8) Prospective cohort +
34 Blitz et al. (44) United States (New York) Universal testing for coronavirus 2019 in pregnant women admitted for delivery: prevalence of peripartum infection and rate of asymptomatic carriers at four New York hospitals within an integrated healthcare system 382 318 (83.3) 64 (16.7) 45 (70.3) 19 (29.7) Retrospective cohort ++
TOTAL 19,958 18,896 (94.7) 1,062 (5.3) 802 (75.5) 260 (24.5)

N, Pregnant women who were universally tested; a, Asymptomatic and inconclusive (n = 1); b, Results were not obtained within clinically relevant time frame (n=26); c, Two women (n = 2) excluded as one was previously suspected and other one declined testing; RoB, Risk of bias; +, Low risk of bias; ++, Medium risk of bias; +++, Serious risk of bias.