Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;52(11):13114–13131. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03222-y

Table 7.

Performance comparison of different model combinations

Type Methods Error rate AUC F1
BBLC-based Logistic Regression 0.3563 0.7005 0.7465
Support Vector Machine 0.2706 0.7292 0.7568
Random Forest 0.2419 0.7534 0.7815
Customized XGBoost 0.2131 0.7992 0.8075
HDL-based Logistic Regression 0.2546 0.7378 0.7863
Support Vector Machine 0.2234 0.7681 0.8077
Random Forest 0.1623 0.8357 0.8548
Customized XGBoost 0.1012 0.8639 0.8927