Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 18;71(3):553–560. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323132

Table 4.

Polyp detection rates

Linked Colour imaging (N=160) High-definition white light endoscopy (N=172) Risk ratio
(two-sided 95% CI)
P value
(two-sided)
Polyps† 71 (44.4%) 62 (36.0%) 1.23 (0.95 to 1.60) 0.12
Adenomas 58 (36.3%) 44 (25.6%) 1.42 (1.02 to 1.96) 0.04*
Advanced adenomas 7 (4.4%) 8 (4.6%) 0.94 (0.35 to 2.43) 1.00‡
Flat adenomas§ 27 (16.9%) 20 (11.6%) 1.45 (0.85 to 2.48) 0.18
≤5 mm adenomas 52 (32.5%) 38 (22.1%) 1.47 (1.03 to 2.11) 0.03*
>5 mm adenomas 12 (7.5%) 12 (7.0%) 1.09 (0.50 to 2.32) 0.85
Proximal adenomas¶ 45 (28.1%) 32 (18.6%) 1.51 (1.01 to 1.51) 0.04†
Serrated polyps 28 (17.5%) 24 (14.0%) 1.25 (0.76 to 2.07) 0.38
Sessile serrated lesions 11 (6.9%) 12 (7.0%) 0.98 (0.45 to 2.17) 0.97
Proximal serrated polyps¶ 18 (11.3%) 17 (9.9%) 1.14 (0.61 to 2.13) 0.69
Hyperplastic polyps 17 (10.6%) 15 (8.7%) 1.21 (0.63 to 2.36) 0.56

Data are n (%).

*p<0.05, **p<0.01.

†1–5 mm hyperplastic polyps in the rectosigmoid, normal mucosa, other non-neoplastic lesions and lesions not retrieved for pathology were excluded.

‡P value was calculated using Fisher’s exact test instead of χ2 test since the expected values in any cells of contingency table were below 10.

§Morphology 0-IIa, 0-IIb, or IIc according to Paris classification.

¶Proximal to splenic flexure.