Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Aug 5;216(6):1614–1625. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24172

TABLE 5:

Sensitivity and Specificity for Grading Cartilage Lesions on Conventional MRI, qDESS, and qDESS Plus T2 Mapping Compared With the Arthroscopic Reference Standard

Cartilage Lesion Grade, Sequence Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) p a
1
 Conventional MRI 33 (20–48) 56 (51–60) 53 (49–58) NA
 qDESS 23 (12–37) 53 (49–58) 51 (46–55) .81
 qDESS plus T2 mapping 46 (31–61) 39 (35–44) 40 (35–45) .80
2A
 Conventional MRI 27 (18–37) 53 (48–58) 48 (44–53) NA
 qDESS 26 (17–36) 52 (47–56) 47 (43–52) .02
 qDESS plus T2 mapping 58 (47–68) 40 (35–45) 43 (39–48) < .001
2B
 Conventional MRI 81 (71–88) 64 (60–69) 67 (63–71) NA
 qDESS 76 (65–85) 62 (57–67) 65 (60–69) .22
 qDESS plus T2 mapping 86 (77–93) 46 (41–51) 53 (48–57) .003
3
 Conventional MRI 93 (81–99) 61 (57–66) 64 (60–68) NA
 qDESS 93 (81–99) 60 (56–65) 63 (59–67) .45
 qDESS plus T2 mapping 98 (88–99) 44 (40–49) 49 (44–53) .63

Note—Values in parentheses are the 95% CI. qDESS = quantitative double-echo steady-state, NA = not applicable.

a

Values signify differences in the sensitivity and specificity confusion matrix between qDESS (with and without T2 maps for cartilage) and conventional MRI.