Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2021 Dec 24;72:219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.11.012

Table 1.

Summary of representative computational approaches for ΔΔG prediction.

Categories Names Webservers/Softwares Unique features/advantages References
Energy-based FoldX http://foldxsuite.crg.eu Uses a rotamer library [24, 25]
Rosetta - Uses a rotamer library, focusing on alanine mutations [26]
CC/PBSA - Considers structural flexibility [27]
ZEMu https://simtk.org/projects/rnatoolbox Uses a multiscale method which models flexibility of mutation region [28]
Flex ddG https://github.com/Kortemme-Lab/flex_ddG_tutorial Samples conformational diversity using “backrub” to generate an ensemble of models [29]
BeAtMuSiC http://babylone.ulb.ac.be/beatmusic Uses the coarse-grained representation of protein structures [30]
Contact potentials-based model - Uses atomic and residue contact potentials [31]
BindProfX https://zhanglab.dcmb.med.umich.edu/BindProfX Calculates ΔΔG as the logarithm of relative probability of mutant residues over wild-type ones [32]
SSIPe https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/SSIPe https://github.com/tommyhuangthu/SSIPe Combines interface profiles derived from structural and sequence homology searches with a physics-based energy [33]
Machine learning-based mCSM-PPI2 http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/mcsm_ppi2 Integrates mCSM graph-based signatures, evolutionary information, inter-residue non-covalent interaction networks analysis and energetic terms with ETs [36]
iSEE https://github.com/haddocking/iSee Combines structural, evolutionary, and energetic features with RF [37]
TopNetTree https://codeocean.com/capsule/2202829/tree/v1 Integrates topological describtors with CNN-assisted GBDT [38]
MutaBind2 https://lilab.jysw.suda.edu.cn/research/mutabind2 Combines a set of scoring functions with RF [39]
ELASPIC2 http://elaspic.kimlab.org https://gitlab.com/elaspic/elaspic2 Incoraporates features generated using pre-trained TNN and GNN, and employs GBDT with a ranking object function [40]
ProAffiMuSeq https://web.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo2/proaffimuseq Considers the functional classes [41]
MuPIPR https://github.com/guangyu-zhou/MuPIPR An end-to-end deep learning framework using Bi-LSTM, RCNN and MLP without the need of hand-crafted features [23]
SAAMBE-SEQ http://compbio.clemson.edu/saambe_webserver/indexSEQ.php#started Employs GBDT on a set of features, and doesn’t require the knowledge of interfacial residue [42]