Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;22:242. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07604-3

Table 3.

Classification of the high, medium, and low vulnerability provinces or cities in 2018 survey wave

Class Range of vulnerability
(Average Value)
Provinces or Cites of VEP
(Poverty line = $1.9)
Provinces or Cites of VEP
(Poverty line = $3.2)
High vulnerability 60% ~ 70%

Beijing, Shanghai,

Zhejiang, Jiangsu,

Hainan, Shangxi

Beijing, Shanghai,

Zhejiang, Guangdong,

Jiangsu, Hainan,

Heilongjiang, Chongqing,

Hunan, Yunnan,

Shandong, Hebei, Shangxi

Moderate vulnerability 50% ~ 60%

Guangdong, Heilongjiang,

Chongqing, Hunan,

Yunnan, Fujian,

Shandong, Hebei,

Anhui, Shanxi,

Liaoning

Fujian, Henan,

Hubei, Jiangxi,

Anhui, Guizhou,

Shanxi, Sichuan,

Gansu, Liaoning

Low vulnerability Below 50%

Henan, Tianjin, Hubei,

Jiangxi, Guangxi,

Guizhou, Sichuan,

Xinjiang, Tibet, Gansu, Jilin

Tianjin, Guangxi,

Xinjiang, Tibet,

Jilin

Source: VEP estimation method using CFPS 2018 [31, 3436, 56]