Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;22:242. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07604-3

Table 7.

Marginal logistic regression results of the poverty effect of the fiscal transfer payment on rural family health care vulnerability

Variables VEP_1
(Poverty line = $1.9)
VEP_2
(Poverty line = $3.2)
2014 2016 2018 2014 2016 2018
E_H

−0.0281***

(0.000)

− 0.0220***

(0.000)

− 0.0791***

(0.000)

−0.0174***

(0.000)

− 0.0512***

(0.000)

−0.0925***

(0.000)

GTP*E_H

−0.0258***

(0.000)

− 0.5279*** (0.000)

− 0.1981***

(0.000)

−0.0124***

(0.009)

− 0.3205***

(0.000)

−0.2283***

(0.000)

Age

0.0006

(0.602)

0.0009

(0.400)

0.0042*

(0.100)

0.0002

(0.770)

0.0007

(0.421)

0.0004(0.856)
Age2

0.0009

(0.437)

−0.0003

(0.746)

− 0.0014*

(0.588)

0.0001

(0.913)

0.0009

(0.251)

0.0052**

(0.043)

Gender

0.0217***

(0.003)

0.0075*

(0.070)

−0.1026***

(0.000)

0.0154***

(0.005)

0.0108**

(0.028)

−0.0822***

(0.000)

Y_E

- 0.0004

(0.511)

−0.0015**

(0.026)

−0.0096***

(0.000)

− 0.00036

(0.514)

−0.0005

(0.347)

0.0105***

(0.000)

F_S

0.0229***

(0.000)

0.0199***

(0.000)

−.0133***

(0.000)

0.0158***

(0.000)

0.0136***

(0.000)

−0.0440***

(0.000)

Loglikelihood − 1288.93 − 1022.16 − 3793.30 − 802.56 − 626.31 − 3524.67
LR Statistics 316.23 1137.70 388.73 223.67 672.69 810.15
Number of Sampling 5754 5754 5754 5754 5754 5754

Source: CFPS 2014, 2016 and 2018 [56]

Note: *, **, *** represented statistic indicators significantly at 10, 5, and 1%, respectively