Table 6.
Comparison of the TSV model with previous studies conducted in offices.
| Author | Place | Neutral T/SET* (°C) |
Linear regression equation | Acceptable temperature zone (°C) | Building type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This study | Guangzhou | 26.5 | MTSV = 0.3975 Top− 10.499 | 23.7–28.9 | Library (Without masks) |
| 26.2 | MTSV = 0.3596 Top− 9.5088 | 23.3–28.4 | Library (With masks) | ||
| 25.3 | MTSV = 0.188 SET* − 4.7501 | 22.8–29.0 | Library (Without masks) | ||
| 25.0 | MTSV = 0.2014 SET*− 5.0402 | 22.3–28.8 | Library (With masks) | ||
| Fu et al. [56] | Guangzhou | 26.2 | MTSV = 0.301 Top− 7.902 | 22.9–29.6 | Prefab site office |
| Wu et al. [60] | Guangzhou | 26.8 | TSV = 0.2796 T − 7.5009 | / | Office |
| Yang and Zhang [71] | Changsha | 27.7 | TSV = 0.32 Top− 9.12 | 25.1–30.3 | Residential/Office |
| Luo et al. [55] | Shenzhen | 25.0 | TSV = 0.203 Top− 5.077 | 20.2–29.4 | Office |
| Indraganti et al. [72] | Tokyo | 27.1 | TSV = 0.299 T − 8.109 | / | Office |
| Indraganti et al. [44] | Hyderabad | 26.1 | TS = 0.194 Tg− 5.103 | / | Office |
| Chennai | 27.0 | TS = 0.110 Tg− 3.029 | / | Office | |
| Zheng et al. [61] | Guangzhou | 25.6 | MTSV = 0.2381 SET* − 6.1052 | 21.1–31.9 | Office |
| Ji et al. [58] | Guangzhou | 26.18 | TSV = 0.2345 SET* − 6.1403 | / | Office |
| Dhaka and Mathur [25] | Jaipur | 26.36 | TSV = 0.183 SET* − 4.824 | / | Office |
| Tewari et al. [60] | Jaipur | 24.62 | TSV = 0.26 SET* − 6.4 | / | Office |