Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Feb 18:1183–1194. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-89773-0.00059-X

Role of endocrine disruptors in male infertility and impact of COVID-19 on male reproduction

Manesh Kumar Panner Selvam 1, Suresh C Sikka 1
Editor: Ramesh C Gupta2
PMCID: PMC8864147

Abstract

Several epidemiological studies suggest strong association of endocrine disruptors (EDs) with impaired male reproduction. High levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in serum are associated with low sperm count and poor fertility. A high dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane (DDT) concentration results in low serum testosterone (T) and poor semen quality. DDT stimulates estrogen production by acting as estrogen receptor agonist and potent androgen receptor antagonist. Phthalates, another group of EDs, induce seminiferous tubule degeneration with impaired spermatogenesis via disruption of gene expression that regulates cholesterol and lipid homeostasis resulting in low T. Bisphenol A, a strong exogenous estrogen with antiandrogen effect, lowers serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and T, resulting in impaired development of seminiferous tubules and spermatogenesis. Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalates can exert their antiandrogenic action by directly inhibiting testosterone biosynthesis via cytochrome P-450 dysfunction. Since these EDs are commonly found in plastic bottles, cosmetics, pesticides, some metal food cans, etc., and accumulate in the environment, it is very important to observe caution and avoid their exposure. This updated chapter also reviews the impact of COVID-19-related infection on male reproduction.

Keywords: COVID-19, Endocrine disruptors, Environmental toxicants, Male reproduction, Testicular toxicity, Testis development

Introduction

The male reproductive system mainly includes a pair of testes, epididymis, vas deferens, ejaculatory duct, and accessory sex glands (such as seminal vesicles, prostate, and bulbourethral glands) and is regulated by hormones secreted from hypothalamus, pituitary, and gonads. All these organs are susceptible to environmental toxicants, drugs, hormonal disruptors, etc. (Sikka, 2018). These agents have effect on the male reproductive system during embryonic stage and/or throughout the life cycle. Under their influence, the reproductive potential of adult male is compromised affecting his fertility capacity. It may also result in mutagenesis and other developmental issues in their progeny. This updated chapter focuses on male reproductive tract as the target site of many such factors, endocrine disruptors (EDs), and their potential mechanisms of action. In addition, the impact of COVID-19-related infection on the male reproduction is unknown and no scientific data is yet available. Since many healthy young men of reproductive age group are potential target of such infection, it is important to touch some base on this issue.

Development of male genital system

In the initial embryonic phase, male and female external genitalia look similar until 9 weeks. A pair of longitudinal ridges lies ventromedial to the mesonephric kidney. These are called genital or gonadal ridges. Germ cells appear in these ridges after the 5th week. Primordial germ cells appear in the endoderm of the yolk sac and they migrate by ameboid movements, via dorsal mesentery, reaching and invading the genital ridges during the 5th to 6th weeks. If they fail to reach the ridges, the gonads do not develop. The primitive sex cords arise from the epithelium. Prior to the onset of sexual differentiation, the human gonads are composed of proliferating coelomic/mesenchymal cells, primordia germ cells, and endothelial cells. The final form of gonads is usually not visible until week 12 (Table 59.1 ).

Table 59.1.

Embryonic development of male gonads.

Stage Age from conception CR length (mm) Event
I: Indistinguishable phase 32 days 5 Gonadal primordia develop; growth of Wolffian ducts; primordial germ cell differentiation
37 days 10 Primordial germ cells reach gonadal ridge; differentiation of Mullerian ducts
42–50 days 15–20 Seminiferous cord differentiation
55–60 days 30 Beginning of secretion of AMH; Leydig cell differentiation; cranial part of Müllerian ducts begins to regress
9 weeks 40 Leydig cells produce testosterone; beginning of masculinization of urogenital sinus and external genitalia
10 weeks 45–50 Meiotic entry of oocytes in the medulla; beginning of degeneration of female Wolffian ducts; male Müllerian ducts disappear; prostatic buds appear
12 weeks 55–60 Seminal vesicles develop; testis at internal inguinal ring
II: External male genital organ development phase 14 weeks 70 Completion of male urethral organogenesis
20 weeks 150 Testosterone serum level is low; formation of prostatic utricle
24 weeks 200 Beginning of penile growth
27–30 weeks 230–265 Inguinoscrotal descent of the testis

CR, crown-rump length and measurement establishes fetus age.

Development of the male reproductive system is controlled by the SRY sex-determining gene on the short arm of the Y-chromosome. SRY gene leads to the production of Mullerian-inhibiting substance (MIS), and testosterone. MIS is produced by the Sertoli cells and causes regression of paramesonephric ducts. Testosterone produced by the Leydig cells influences the differentiation of the mesonephric ducts into male genital ducts and modulates the differentiation of the male external genitalia. In females there is no MIS and testosterone and instead development of uterine tubes and uterus takes place from paramesonephric and mesonephric duct system regression.

Male reproductive tract as target site

The human male reproductive tract consists of a pair of gonads called testes, a series of ducts (epididymis, vas deferens, ejaculatory duct, and urethra that serve to transport spermatozoa to the female reproductive tract), and accessory sex glands (seminal vesicles, prostate, and bulbourethral glands). The development and function of these are under control of hormones from hypothalamus, pituitary, and gonads.

Testes

In humans each testis weighs about 25 g (0.875 ounce) and is 4–5 cm (1.6–2.0 inches) long and 2–3 cm (0.8–1.2 inches) in diameter. Each testis is covered by a fibrous capsule called the tunica albuginea and is divided by partitions of fibrous tissue from the tunica albuginea into 200–400 wedge-shaped sections, or lobes. Within each lobe are 3–10 coiled tubules, called seminiferous tubules, which produce the sperm cells. The partitions between the lobes and the seminiferous tubules both converge in one area near the anal side of each testis to form what is called the mediastinum testis. The testes originally develop in the abdomen and descend into the scrotum, a sac of skin and connective tissue positioned outside the pelvic cavity. This scrotal location is important for maintaining a testicular temperature to about 35°C, approximately 2°C below body temperature of 37°C. This cooler temperature is required for spermatogenesis, a process of multiple cell divisions (meiosis and mitosis) to form spermatozoa. Inside each testis there is a network of fine-diameter tubes called seminiferous tubules residing in association with Sertoli cells and Leydig cells. Sertoli cells nourish, support, and protect developing germ cells by forming a “blood–testis barrier” that keeps away the unwanted toxicants. Spermatogenesis begins near the wall of a seminiferous tubule, and after multiple divisions, the spermatozoa are shed into the inner lumen of the tubules. Proteins produced by Sertoli cells are required for spermatogenesis, as is the testosterone from Leydig cells.

Leydig cells

Leydig cells are located in the interstitium of the testis near the seminiferous tubules. These cells arise from interstitial mesenchymal tissue between the tubules during the 8th week of human embryonic development. The development and maturation of Leydig cells are dynamic processes involving interaction between hormones and numerous additional factors. In humans, fetal and adult populations of Leydig cells with distinct lineages have been described. The fetal population represents an essential element of male sex differentiation, as demonstrated by the observation that dysfunction or absence of these cells gives rise to disorders associated with incomplete masculinization of male fetuses (Caron et al., 1997; Geissler et al., 1994; Svechnikov et al., 2010). During the embryonic and fetal life, these cells secrete testosterone and other androgens, which regulate not only the masculinization of internal and external genitalia, but also neuroendocrine functions, thereby influencing behavioral and metabolic patterns.

Finally, following a prolonged childhood period of steroidogenic quiescence, the Leydig cells are stimulated by the pituitary gonadotropin luteinizing hormone (LH) to grow in number and cellular size, and, at the same time, mature and differentiate to initiate the pubertal surge of testosterone required for the start and maintenance of full spermatogenesis, development of the accessory sex glands, and appearance of the secondary sexual characteristics. The developmental transitions of the different types of Leydig cells are regulated by a complex cocktail of endocrine and paracrine factors, which trigger cascades of cellular events (e.g., the expression of steroidogenic enzymes and androgen receptor) that optimize cellular activity for each particular period of male development.

Sertoli cells

Sertoli cells are somatic cells that associate with germ cells and nurture their development into sperm. They are the first cell type known to differentiate within the gonad from bipotential precursors of the supporting cell lineage and are therefore the first indicator that the gonad has passed from the indifferent stage into testis development. These cells form a continuous and complete lining within the tubular wall and establish the blood–testis barrier by virtue of tight junctions. The luminal environment is both created and controlled by these Sertoli cells, also called “nurse cells.” These Sertoli cells have several functions including providing structural support and nutrition to developing germ cells, phagocytosis of degenerating germ cells and residual bodies, release of spermatids at spermiation, and production of a host of proteins that regulate and/or respond to pituitary hormone release and that influence mitotic activity of spermatogonia.

Spermatogenesis and spermiation

Spermatogenesis is a chronological process spanning about 42 days in the rodent and 72 days in man. Spermatogenesis can be divided into three distinct phases: mitosis, meiosis, and spermiogenesis. The first phase is referred to as spermatogonial proliferation and renewal. During this period, relatively undifferentiated diploid spermatogonia, the immature germ cells, undergo several mitotic divisions to generate a large population of cells called primary spermatocytes. In the second phase the spermatocytes go through the process of two meiotic divisions leading to the formation of haploid germ cells, spermatids. In the third phase, the spermatids go through a complex series of cytological transformations and dedifferentiate to form stem cells that cyclically develop into highly specialized spermatozoa. Spermiogenesis is the transformation of spermatids into the elongated flagellar germ cells capable of motility. The release of mature germ cells is known as spermiation. The germ cells comprise the majority of testicular volume. A smaller than normal size indicates testicular damage. A significant characteristic of mitotic arrest is that the gonocyte becomes acutely sensitive to toxic agents that may completely eradicate germ cells. Hormonal control of spermatogenesis varies among species. The initiation of spermatogenesis occurs at the onset of puberty due to the interactions of the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and Sertoli and Leydig cells. If the pituitary gland is removed, spermatogenesis can still be initiated by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and testosterone.

Steroidogenesis

Steroidogenesis is the multistep process for biosynthesis of steroid hormones from cholesterol. Primary organs for steroidogenesis in the male are the pair of testes and adrenal glands. In the testis, steroidogenesis is restricted to Leydig cells where conversion of cholesterol to testosterone (T) takes place with the help of cytochrome P450 enzymes predominantly in delta-5 pathway in human (Sikka et al., 1986; Miller and Auchus, 2011; Odermatt et al., 2016). Within the steroid hormone biosynthetic pathway, cytochrome P450–dependent steroidogenic regulatory proteins [17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase/17,20-demolase, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD), and 17β-HSD] are recognized as important targets for the actions of EDs leading to the reduction of androgens (Jeng, 2014).

Hormonal control

There are six major hormones involved in regulating the male reproductive system. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is mainly present in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus and upon release travels to the pituitary gland where it stimulates the biosynthesis and secretion of the gonadotropins, FSH, and LH. Both LH and FSH are released by the anterior pituitary gland. In the testes, LH binds to receptors on Leydig cells, which stimulates the biosynthesis and secretion of T and other androgens. T stimulates the sex drive, and is the hormone that is associated with aggression. Inhibin is made by the Sertoli cells when they are low in nutrients and unable to nourish developing germ cells. Inhibin acts as a negative feedback, going to the brain to slow the release of GnRH and FSH (Fig. 59.1 ).

Figure 59.1.

Figure 59.1

Hormonal regulation of the male reproductive system: gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates the production of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), which act on the testes to begin spermatogenesis and develop secondary sex characteristics in the male. In turn, the testes production of testosterone and the hormone inhibin inhibit the release of GnRH, FSH, and LH via negative feedback loops.

FSH stimulates both the production of androgen-binding protein by Sertoli cells and the formation of the blood–testis barrier. Androgen-binding protein is essential to concentrating T in levels high enough to initiate and maintain spermatogenesis, which can be 20–50 times higher than the concentration found in blood. Increasing the levels of FSH will increase the production of spermatozoa by preventing the apoptosis of type A spermatogonia. The hormone inhibin acts to decrease the levels of FSH. Both LH and FSH support the process of spermatogenesis by suppressing the proapoptotic signals and, therefore, promote spermatogenic cell survival. The Leydig cells and Sertoli cells also mediate part of spermatogenesis through production of T, estradiol, and inhibin.

Endocrine disruptors

The term “endocrine-disrupting chemicals” (EDCs) was first coined in 1993 to describe a group of chemicals that could mimic the action of endogenous hormones, disrupting hormone homeostasis (Colborn et al., 1993). It was suggested that exposure to these chemicals was responsible for the increased incidences of lower fertility, intersexed animals, disrupted sexual development, obesity, diabetes, endometriosis, etc. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, an EDC is defined as “an exogenous agent that can interfere with the production, release, transport, metabolism, binding, action, or elimination of natural hormones in the body responsible for the maintenance of homeostasis and the regulation of developmental processes” (Kavlock et al., 1996). In the present scenario, these EDs are found in many industrial products including plastic bottles, metal cans, detergents, flame retardants, many food items, toys, cosmetics, and pesticides. According to the United Nations Environmental program, close to 800 chemicals are known or suspected to be capable of interfering with hormone receptors, hormone synthesis, or hormones conversion. However, only a small fraction of these chemicals has been investigated in tests capable of identifying overt endocrine effects in intact organisms. From the pharmacological perspective, modulation of hormonal signaling could have potentially therapeutic effects (Table 59.2 ).

Table 59.2.

Hormones and antagonists—sites of action.

Classification Drug/Antagonists Sites of action
Corticosteroids Prednisolone Chronic illnesses such as colitis, multiple sclerosis, and arthritis
Estrogens Ethinyl estradiol Contraceptive pills
Selective estrogen-receptor modulator Tamoxifen, raloxifene, tibolone, toremifene Breast cancer, prostate cancer
Selective estrogen-receptor degrader Fulvestrant Breast cancer
Aromatase inhibitors Letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane Breast cancer
Progestins Hydroxyprogesterone Preterm birth, endometrial carcinoma
Antiandrogens Flutamide, bicalutamide Prostate cancer, hirsutism, and other androgen-dependent conditions
5-α Reductase inhibitors Finasteride, dutasteride Benign prostatic hyperplasia, male pattern baldness
GnRH analogs Naferelin, goserelin, leuprolide, degarelix Carcinoma breast, prostate

It is estimated that a large proportion (up to 40%) of young men have low semen quality (Sinclair, 2000), high incidence of undescended testes (cryptorchidism), testicular cancer, and genital malformations (hypospadias) in baby boys (Giwercman and Bonde, 1998; McLachlan et al., 1998; Skakkebaek et al., 1998).

Exposure and regulation of EDs

Exposure to EDs could be through air, water, food, detergents, flame retardants, pesticides, and a variety of industrial products, including personal care items. The mixture of EDs that leach into the soil and waterbodies (e.g., pesticides, contraceptive pills, and other chemicals from the urban and agricultural waste) accumulates in the environment and thus into the food chain. Food is the major source of human ED exposure (e.g., meat, fish, dairy products, vegetables, and water). Schecter et al. (2004) reported a total of 32 food samples from three major supermarket chains in Dallas, Texas, were contaminated with polybrominated diphenyl esters. Plastic packaging is another important source of ED in average human diet. Repeated exposure of food-contact materials to heat or acidic/alkaline contents may cause breakdown of polymers into monomers as phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA), which then leaches into the food and beverages (Muncke, 2011). Among the natural EDs phytoestrogens have been reported in high concentrations in infants ingesting soy-based formulas. These infants may have a phytoestrogen serum concentration 13–22 thousand times higher than endogenous estrogen levels that may affect brain, reproductive organs, and, ultimately, fertility (Dinsdale and Ward, 2010; Setchell et al., 1998).

Association between EDs and testicular dysgenesis syndrome

Cryptorchidism, hypospadias, testicular cancer, and poor semen quality may all be symptoms of the entity called testicular dysgenesis syndrome, which has its origin in fetal life (Skakkebaek et al., 2001). Testicular dysgenesis may be caused by genetic and environmental factors, lifestyle factors, or a combination of these (Fig. 59.2 ).

Figure 59.2.

Figure 59.2

Schematic representation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals affecting both Leydig cell and Sertoli cell functions, leading to downstream abnormalities.

Cryptorchidism

Cryptorchidism is a common urogenital malformation affecting 2%–9% of boys at birth and 1%–3% boys at 3 months of age. Testicular descent occurs in two phases: (1) transabdominal phase, which is T independent and requires insulin-like factor 3 (Insl3), and (2) the transinguinal and inguinoscrotal phase, which depends on androgen and Insl3 signaling. With a vast majority of cryptorchidism cases not linked with genetic factors, an increase in the incidences of cryptorchidism in the last decade has been linked to environmental factors including EDs, mainly estrogenic compounds (diethylstilbestrol), antiandrogens (e.g., vinclozolin, flutamide, phthalate esters, and procymidone), pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ether, dioxins, flame retardants, and phthalates (Martin et al., 2008; Palmer et al., 2009; Toppari et al., 1996; Virtanen and Adamsson, 2012) (Fig. 59.3 ).

Figure 59.3.

Figure 59.3

Schematic representation of possible targets of endocrine disruptors (EDs) in testicular descent.

Testicular cancer

Testicular cancer is a common malignancy in young men (aged 15–34 years) worldwide (Wu et al., 2005). About 95% of all testicular cancers are germ cell tumors (GCTs), with an approximately equal division between seminomas and nonseminomatous GCTs. Epidemiological studies show both geographical variability and dramatic upward trends in the incidence of testicular GCTs (TGCTs) (Adami et al., 1994; Diamanti-Kandarakis et al., 2009; Huyghe et al., 2003; McGlynn et al., 2003). Such a temporal rise over a relatively short period suggests nongenetic factors pointing to environmental and lifestyle factors may be playing a significant role. Increased exposure to p,p′-dichloro diphenyl ethylene (DDE) and PCB has been reported to associate with the risk of both seminomatous and nonseminomatous TGCTs (McGlynn et al., 2008). Subjects in the highest serum p,p′-DDE quartile (>0.39 μg/g lipid) compared to those in the first serum p,p′-DDE quartile (0.157 μg/g lipid) supported such an increased risk of TGCT in men exposed to DDE and PCB (Purdue et al., 2009).

Effect of various endocrine disruptors on male fertility

Listed below are some of the key EDs that have been found to affect male fertility.

Bisphenol A

BPA (2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane), a monomer of polycarbonate plastics, is one of the most common EDCs. It was first developed as synthetic estrogen (also called xenoestrogen, from the Greek xeno = foreign) in the 1890s. Thereafter, BPA has been used in numerous consumer products, including polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins, such as food and drink containers, plastic water bottles, dental sealants, and a variety of household products. BPA is widespread in the environment and every year 2.2–4.7 million tons of BPA are released into the environment (Knez, 2013; Liu et al., 2013). Human body is exposed to 10 μg of BPA per day, which can be detected in several human body fluids including serum, urine, breast milk, and semen (Vandenberg et al., 2010). BPA has weak affinity to bind to the estrogen α and β receptor and has been reported to interfere with both androgen production and function (Akingbemi et al., 2004; Knez, 2013; Lee et al., 2003; Welshons et al., 2003). It has also been reported to impair Sertoli cell function by interfering with expression and localization of tight junction protein (Fiorini et al., 2004; Li et al., 2009; Salian et al., 2009). Furthermore, BPA has been shown to have epigenetic effects, including DNA hypomethylation (Doshi et al., 2011; Singh and Li, 2012). A study from Komarowska et al. (2015) indicated that high serum BPA was associated with cryptorchidism. Many studies have shown that increased urinary BPA levels are associated with poor semen quality, decreased sperm concentrations, and decreased and increased single-strand breaks causing sperm DNA damage (Li et al., 2011; Meeker et al., 2010). However, such data have not provided sound evidence to reveal that detrimental environmental BPA exposure affects male reproductive capacity and impairs fertility.

Phthalate

The diesters of 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid (phthalic acid), commonly known as phthalates, are a group of man-made chemicals widely used in hundreds of products in our homes, hospitals, cars, and businesses (Johnson et al., 2012; Knez, 2013). They are primarily used to make flexible polyvinyl chloride plastic because of their strong durability and stability. Phthalates are categorized as high and low, depending on their molecular weight. High phthalates are those with 7–13 carbon atoms in their backbone and include diisononyl phthalates, diisodecyl phthalates, and dipropylheptyl phthalates. High phthalates are primarily used for wires, cables, flooring, wall covering, self-adhesive films, synthetic leather, coating fabrics, roofing, and automobile applications. On the other hand, low phthalates are those with three to six carbon atoms in their chemical backbone and include di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalates (DEHP) and dibutyl phthalates (DBPs). These are primarily used in medical devices, adhesives, ink, perfumes, and hair fixative spray. Since phthalates are not covalently bound to the polymer, they can leach from plastic into foods, beverages, and body fluids with product age, use, and ultraviolet light exposure, making them more hazardous for health. Ingestion, inhalation, skin absorption, and through intravenous injection tubing are potential modes of phthalate exposure. Typically, phthalate intake in humans is estimated at 1.7–52.1 μg/kg per day, whereas exposure of children is two- to fourfold higher than that of adults (Doull et al., 1999; Koch et al., 2005; Martinez-Arguelles et al., 2013; Moody et al., 2013). Several studies have demonstrated a link between phthalate exposure and disorders of male reproduction. Phthalates are considered to be one of the major groups of antiandrogenic substances which have possible adverse effect on Leydig cells or the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis (Main et al., 2006). Phthalate exposure has been linked with presence of multinucleated germ cells and adult pathologies such as Leydig cell aggregation, Sertoli cell–only tubules, poor spermatogenesis, TGCTs, increased sperm DNA damage, and reduced semen quality (Hoei-Hansen et al., 2003; Jeng, 2014; Knez, 2013; Nistal et al., 2006). Studies showed that mono-butyl phthalate and phthalate metabolites were significantly associated with decreased sperm motility (Hauser et al., 2006; Jeng, 2014; Jurewicz et al., 2013).

Alkylphenols and their derivatives

Alkylphenols are organic industrial chemicals used in the production of lubricating oil additives, laundry and dish detergents, emulsifiers, and solubilizers (Soares et al., 2008). They are also found in personal care products, especially hair products, as an active component of many spermicides (nonoxynol-9), various laboratory detergents (including Triton X-100), and some pesticide formulations. The exposure to these compounds is via skin, air, and water. Unlike most of the exogenous chemicals, which usually become less toxic with degradation, alkylphenols actually increase their toxicity with time. During biodegradation, alkylphenol polyethoxylates lose ethoxy groups to become alkylphenols (typically nonylphenol), which are more stable, persistent, and hydrophobic, leading to their accumulation in sewerages and rivers and their volatilization into ambient air (Davis et al., 1994; Rudel et al., 2003). Many alkylphenols are toxic to aquatic organisms, and the most toxic are those with a large alkyl chain, i.e., octyl-, nonyl-, and dodecyl-phenol. Alkylphenols have attracted attention due to their prevalence in the environment and potential roles as EDs and xenoestrogen. Exposure of nonylphenol and octylphenol has been shown to cause testicular damage, decreased testicular size, decreased sperm production/quality, and dysfunction of male reproduction system (De Jager et al., 1999; Falco et al., 2015; Lee et al., 1999; Ponzo and Silvia, 2013).

Molecular mechanism of endocrine-disrupting chemicals

DNA integrity

The structure of the sperm chromatin is unique compared to other cell types. Histones in sperm head are replaced by protamines during spermatogenesis, resulting in an extremely condensed DNA (Dadoune, 1995). Alteration in chromatin modeling, apoptosis, and oxidative stress can result in abnormalities of the sperm chromatin structure and DNA damage affecting fertility, abnormal pronuclear formation, or early embryo quality and pregnancy outcome. There are a number of studies showing sperm DNA damage as a result of EDs, although with contradictory epidemiological data. The reasons for this inconsistency might be different methodologies used to detect sperm DNA damage, variation of exposure of EDs and their mixtures, and different inclusion criteria for the studies (Bungum et al., 2007; Hauser et al., 2003; Rignell-Hydbom et al., 2005). Nevertheless, EDCs have been associated with sperm DNA fragmentation (Bonde et al., 2008; Hauser et al., 2007; Jurewicz et al., 2013) and impaired sperm chromatin condensation (De Jager et al., 2006; Rignell-Hydbom et al., 2005; Spano et al., 2005), and induce point mutation, single- and double-strand DNA breaks, and aneuploidy (Iso et al., 2006; Meeker et al., 2010; Takahashi et al., 2001).

Induction of oxidative stress

Oxidative stress is a collective term that includes highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl ions, superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxides, and many antioxidant enzymes (Wright et al., 2014). In spermatozoa, ROS are also required for a number of specific and essential functions (e.g., sperm capacitation, acrosome reaction). Due to the short half-life of ROS produced by spermatozoa, they are relatively harmless under normal circumstances. In addition, antioxidant mechanisms help maintain the key balance that is required for these ROS-related physiological functions (Sikka, 2001). However, increased concentration of ROS in the seminal plasma can attack DNA, lipids, and proteins of sperm; alter enzymatic systems; produce irreparable alterations; and cause cell death leading to a decline in the semen parameters associated with male infertility (Agarwal et al., 2014). Oxidative stress is identified as a common mechanism of action for EDs in affecting cellular structures and functions (Braconi et al., 2011). BPA and phthalates induce testicular toxicity via increasing oxidative stress by downregulating the production of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase (Asghari et al., 2015; Dhanabalan and Mathur, 2009). Studies on testis have shown that EDs induce oxidative stress causing disruption of tight junctions between Sertoli–Sertoli cells and Sertoli–germ cells (Cheng et al., 2010; Wong and Cheng, 2009). This disruption of cell junction is mediated by the activation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/c-Src/focal adhesion kinase and MAPK signaling pathways affecting polarity proteins. Thus disruption of such cell junctions ultimately leads to reduced sperm count, sperm quality, and reproductive dysfunction in men.

COVID-19 impact on male reproductive hormones

Coronavirus infection discovered in 2019 (COVID-19) is likely to have potential impact on the physiological function of male gonads (Khalili et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2021; Tian and Zhou 2021). Male infertility is linked with testicular pathology via dysregulation of HPG axis (Selvaraj et al., 2021, Sengupta and Dutta, 2021). Recent studies indicate abnormal levels of reproductive hormones in men infected with COVID-19. The FSH/LH ratio was altered due to increased levels of LH and decreased levels of testosterone in subjects with COVID-19 (Ma et al., 2020). Moreover, LH and FSH levels increased based on the severity of the disease (Cayan et al., 2020). In addition, low testosterone levels were reported in COVID-19 patients (Ma et al., 2020, Rastrelli et al. 2021; Kadihasanoglu et al., 2020) and it was correlated with increased levels of proinflammatory factors such as IFN-γ and IL-2 (Schroeder et al., 2020). The levels of these hormones were in normal range in patients recovered from COVID-19 infection (Temiz et al., 2021). In addition to imbalances in the reproductive hormones, Sansone et al. (2021) highlighted the possible damage to the vascular integrity due to COVID-19 infection that may result in erectile dysfunction. COVID-19 infection has no age barrier and is affecting many young men of reproductive age.

Concluding remarks and future directions

Several epidemiological studies have found an association of increased urinary and serum levels of EDs with poor semen quality (Abdelouahab et al., 2011; Hauser et al., 2006; Meeker et al., 2010). Men with >240 ng/g lipid PCBs in serum have shown an inability to conceive which is associated with low sperm concentration (Hauser et al., 2002). Exposure to high dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane (DDT) concentration has been linked to low serum T and poor semen quality. DDT stimulates estrogen production by acting as estrogen receptor agonist and potent androgen receptor antagonist (Bulayeva and Watson, 2004; Lemaire et al., 2004; Tessier and Matsumura, 2001). Phthalates, another group of EDs, have shown to alter reproductive tract structure, seminiferous tubule degeneration, and impaired spermatogenesis (Campion et al., 2012). BPA, a strong exogenous estrogen with antiandrogen effect, reduces LH, and decreases development of seminiferous tubules and spermatogenesis (Al-Hiyasat and Darmani, 2006; Furuya et al., 2006). Summarized below are other highlights of such reproductive toxicity in men:

  • Urinary phthalate metabolites and BPA levels were negatively associated with FSH, LH, and T levels (Duty et al., 2005; Jonsson et al., 2005; Pan et al., 2006).

  • DEHPs can exert their antiandrogenic action by directly inhibiting T synthesis via cytochrome P450 dysfunction (Diamanti-Kandarakis et al., 2009; Foster, 2005).

  • Phthalates have been shown to disrupt the patterns of gene expression that regulate cholesterol and lipid homeostasis resulting in low T and interfere with the ability of Sertoli cells to respond to their normal endogenous ligand of FSH (Barlow et al., 2003; Heindel and Powell, 1992) (Fig. 59.4 ).

  • BPA-induced inhibitory effect on the activity of ATP-binding cassette transporters of the cellular membrane of testicular tissues results in lower T (Dankers et al., 2013).

  • The impact of COVID-19-related infection on the male reproduction is unknown. Since many healthy young men of reproductive age group are potential target of such infection, it is important to understand the mechanisms and further impact on their fertility potential.

Figure 59.4.

Figure 59.4

Scheme showing the potential sites of action of endocrine disruptors on the hypothalamus–pituitary–gonadal axis. FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; HSD, hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; LH, luteinizing hormone.

References

  1. Abdelouahab N., Ainmelk Y., Takser L. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers and sperm quality. Reprod. Toxicol. 2011;31:546–550. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adami H.O., Bergstrom R., Mohner M., et al. Testicular cancer in nine northern European countries. Int. J. Cancer. 1994;59:33–38. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910590108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Agarwal A., Virk G., Ong C., et al. Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. World J. Men Health. 2014;32:1–17. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2014.32.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akingbemi B.T., Ge R., Klinefelter G.R., et al. Phthalate-induced Leydig cell hyperplasia is associated with multiple endocrine disturbances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:775–780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0305977101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-Hiyasat A.S., Darmani H. In vivo effects of BISGMA–a component of dental composite–on male mouse reproduction and fertility. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2006;78:66–72. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asghari M.H., Saeidnia S., Abdollahi M. A review on the biochemical and molecular mechanisms of phthalate-induced toxicity in various organs with a focus on the reproductive system. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2015;11:95–105. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barlow N.J., Phillips S.L., Wallace D.G., et al. Quantitative changes in gene expression in fetal rat testes following exposure to di(n-butyl) phthalate. Toxicol. Sci. 2003;73:431–441. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonde J.P., Toft G., Rylander L., et al. Fertility and markers of male reproductive function in Inuit and European populations spanning large contrasts in blood levels of persistent organochlorines. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008;116:269–277. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Braconi D., Bernardini G., Santucci A. Linking protein oxidation to environmental pollutants: redox proteomic approaches. J. Proteomics. 2011;74:2324–2337. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bulayeva N.N., Watson C.S. Xenoestrogen-induced ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation via multiple membrane-initiated signaling pathways. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004;112:1481–1487. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bungum M., Humaidan P., Axmon A., et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum. Reprod. 2007;22:174–179. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Campion S., Catlin N., Heger N., et al. Male reprotoxicity and endocrine disruption. EXS. 2012;101:315–360. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Caron K.M., Soo S.C., Wetsel W.C., et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse gene encoding steroidogenic acute regulatory protein provides insights into congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997;94:11540–11545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Çayan S., Uğuz M., Saylam B., et al. Effect of serum total testosterone and its relationship with other laboratory parameters on the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in SARS-CoV-2 infected male patients: a cohort study. Aging Male. 2020:1–11. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2020.1807930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng C.Y., Wong E.W., Yan H.H., et al. Regulation of spermatogenesis in the microenvironment of the seminiferous epithelium: new insights and advances. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010;315:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Colborn T., vom Saal F.S., Soto A.M. Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ. Health Perspect. 1993;101:378–384. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dadoune J.P. The nuclear status of human sperm cells. Micron. 1995;26:323–345. doi: 10.1016/0968-4328(95)00007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dankers A.C., Roelofs M.J., Piersma A.H., et al. Endocrine disruptors differentially target ATP-binding cassette transporters in the blood-testis barrier and affect Leydig cell testosterone secretion in vitro. Toxicol. Sci. 2013;136:382–391. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis D.L., Dinse G.E., Hoel D.G. Decreasing cardiovascular disease and increasing cancer among whites in the United States from 1973 through 1987. Good news and bad news. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1994;271:431–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Jager C., Bornman M.S., Oosthuizen J.M. The effect of p-nonylphenol on the fertility potential of male rats after gestational, lactational and direct exposure. Andrologia. 1999;31:107–113. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0272.1999.00246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. De Jager C., Farias P., Barraza-VillarreaL A., et al. Reduced seminal parameters associated with environmental DDT exposure and p,p'-DDE concentrations in men in Chiapas, Mexico: a cross-sectional study. J. Androl. 2006;27:16–27. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.05121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dhanabalan S., Mathur P.P. Low dose of 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin induces testicular oxidative stress in adult rats under the influence of corticosterone. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2009;61:415–423. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2008.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Diamanti-Kandarakis E., Bourguignon J.P., Giudice L.C., et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr. Rev. 2009;30:293–342. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dinsdale E.C., Ward W.E. Early exposure to soy isoflavones and effects on reproductive health: a review of human and animal studies. Nutrients. 2010;2:1156–1187. doi: 10.3390/nu2111156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Doshi T., Mehta S.S., Dighe V., et al. Hypermethylation of estrogen receptor promoter region in adult testis of rats exposed neonatally to bisphenol A. Toxicology. 2011;289:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2011.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Doull J., Cattley R., Elcombe C., et al. A cancer risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate: application of the new US EPA Risk Assessment Guidelines. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1999;29:327–357. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1999.1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Duty S.M., Calafat A.M., Silva M.J., et al. Phthalate exposure and reproductive hormones in adult men. Hum. Reprod. 2005;20:604–610. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Falco M.D., Forte M., Laforgia V. Estrogenic and anti-androgenic endocrine disrupting chemicals and their impact on the male reproductive system. Front. Environ. Sci. 2015;3 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fiorini C., Tilloy-Ellul A., Chevalier S., et al. Sertoli cell junctional proteins as early targets for different classes of reproductive toxicants. Reprod. Toxicol. 2004;18:413–421. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Foster P.M. Mode of action: impaired fetal Leydig cell function–effects on male reproductive development produced by certain phthalate esters. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2005;35:713–719. doi: 10.1080/10408440591007395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Furuya M., Adachi K., Kuwahara S., et al. Inhibition of male chick phenotypes and spermatogenesis by bisphenol-A. Life Sci. 2006;78:1767–1776. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Geissler W.M., Davis D.L., Wu L., et al. Male pseudohermaphroditism caused by mutations of testicular 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 3. Nat. Genet. 1994;7:34–39. doi: 10.1038/ng0594-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Giwercman A., Bonde J.P. Declining male fertility and environmental factors. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 1998;27:807–830 viii. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70042-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hauser R., Altshul L., Chen Z., et al. Environmental organochlorines and semen quality: results of a pilot study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002;110:229–233. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hauser R., Meeker J.D., Duty S., et al. Altered semen quality in relation to urinary concentrations of phthalate monoester and oxidative metabolites. Epidemiology. 2006;17:682–691. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000235996.89953.d7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hauser R., Meeker J.D., Singh N.P., et al. DNA damage in human sperm is related to urinary levels of phthalate monoester and oxidative metabolites. Hum. Reprod. 2007;22:688–695. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hauser R., Singh N.P., Chen Z., et al. Lack of an association between environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and p,p'-DDE and DNA damage in human sperm measured using the neutral comet assay. Hum. Reprod. 2003;18:2525–2533. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Heindel J.J., Powell C.J. Phthalate ester effects on rat Sertoli cell function in vitro: effects of phthalate side chain and age of animal. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1992;115:116–123. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(92)90374-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hoei-Hansen C.E., Holm M., Rajpert-De Meyts E., et al. Histological evidence of testicular dysgenesis in contralateral biopsies from 218 patients with testicular germ cell cancer. J. Pathol. 2003;200:370–374. doi: 10.1002/path.1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Huyghe E., Matsuda T., Thonneau P. Increasing incidence of testicular cancer worldwide: a review. J. Urol. 2003;170:5–11. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000053866.68623.da. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Iso T., Watanabe T., Iwamoto T., et al. DNA damage caused by bisphenol A and estradiol through estrogenic activity. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006;29:206–210. doi: 10.1248/bpb.29.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jeng H.A. Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and male reproductive health. Front. Public Health. 2014;2:55. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Johnson K.J., Heger N.E., Boekelheide K. Of mice and men (and rats): phthalate-induced fetal testis endocrine disruption is species-dependent. Toxicol. Sci. 2012;129:235–248. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jonsson B.A., Richthoff J., Rylander L., et al. Urinary phthalate metabolites and biomarkers of reproductive function in young men. Epidemiology. 2005;16:487–493. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000164555.19041.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jurewicz J., Radwan M., Sobala W., et al. Human urinary phthalate metabolites level and main semen parameters, sperm chromatin structure, sperm aneuploidy and reproductive hormones. Reprod. Toxicol. 2013;42:232–241. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kadihasanoglu M., Aktas S., Yardimci E., et al. SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia affects male reproductive hormone levels: a prospective, cohort study. J. Sex. Med. 2020;18(2):256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kavlock R.J., Daston G.P., Derosa C., et al. Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the US EPA-sponsored workshop. Environ. Health Perspect. 1996;104(Suppl. 4):715–740. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s4715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Khalili M.A., Leisegang K., Majzoub A., et al. Male fertility and the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review of the literature. World J. Mens Health. 2020;38(4):506–520. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Knez J. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and male reproductive health. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2013;26:440–448. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Koch H.M., Preuss R., Drexler H., et al. Exposure of nursery school children and their parents and teachers to di-n-butylphthalate and butylbenzylphthalate. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 2005;78:223–229. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0570-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Komarowska M.D., Hermanowicz A., Czyzewska U., et al. Serum bisphenol A level in boys with cryptorchidism: a step to male infertility? Int. J. Endocrinol. 2015;2015:973154. doi: 10.1155/2015/973154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee H.J., Chattopadhyay S., Gong E.Y., et al. Antiandrogenic effects of bisphenol A and nonylphenol on the function of androgen receptor. Toxicol. Sci. 2003;75:40–46. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lee P.C., Arndt P., Nickels K.C. Testicular abnormalities in male rats after lactational exposure to nonylphenols. Endocrine. 1999;11:61–68. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:11:1:61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Lemaire G., Terouanne B., Mauvais P., et al. Effect of organochlorine pesticides on human androgen receptor activation in vitro. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004;196:235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li D.K., Zhou Z., Miao M., et al. Urine bisphenol-A (BPA) level in relation to semen quality. Fertil. Steril. 2011;95:625–630. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.026. e1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Li Y.J., Song T.B., Cai Y.Y., et al. Bisphenol A exposure induces apoptosis and upregulation of Fas/FasL and caspase-3 expression in the testes of mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2009;108:427–436. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu C., Duan W., Li R., et al. Exposure to bisphenol A disrupts meiotic progression during spermatogenesis in adult rats through estrogen-like activity. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e676. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ma L., Xie W., Li D., et al. Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection upon male gonadal function: a single center-based study. MedRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.21.20037267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Main K.M., Mortensen G.K., Kaleva M.M., et al. Human breast milk contamination with phthalates and alterations of endogenous reproductive hormones in infants 3 months of age. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006;114:270–276. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Martin O.V., Shialis T., Lester J.N., et al. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and the estrogen hypothesis: a quantitative meta-analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008;116:149–157. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Martinez-Arguelles D.B., Campioli E., Culty M., et al. Fetal origin of endocrine dysfunction in the adult: the phthalate model. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013;137:5–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. McGlynn K.A., Devesa S.S., Sigurdson A.J., et al. Trends in the incidence of testicular germ cell tumors in the United States. Cancer. 2003;97:63–70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. McGlynn K.A., Quraishi S.M., Graubard B.I., et al. Persistent organochlorine pesticides and risk of testicular germ cell tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008;100:663–671. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. McLachlan J.A., Newbold R.R., Li S., et al. Are estrogens carcinogenic during development of the testes? APMIS. 1998;106:240–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1998.tb01342.x. (discussion 243–4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Meeker J.D., Ehrlich S., Toth T.L., et al. Semen quality and sperm DNA damage in relation to urinary bisphenol A among men from an infertility clinic. Reprod. Toxicol. 2010;30:532–539. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Miller W.L., Auchus R.J. The molecular biology, biochemistry, and physiology of human steroidogenesis and its disorders. Endocr. Rev. 2011;32:81–151. doi: 10.1210/er.2010-0013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Moody S., Goh H., Bielanowicz A., et al. Prepubertal mouse testis growth and maturation and androgen production are acutely sensitive to di-n-butyl phthalate. Endocrinology. 2013;154:3460–3475. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-2227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Muncke J. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and other substances of concern in food contact materials: an updated review of exposure, effect and risk assessment. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011;127:118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Nistal M., Gonzalez-Peramato P., Regadera J., et al. Primary testicular lesions are associated with testicular germ cell tumors of adult men. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2006;30:1260–1268. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213361.10756.08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Odermatt A., Strajhar P., Engeli R.T. Disruption of steroidogenesis: cell models for mechanistic investigations and as screening tools. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016;158:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Palmer J.R., Herbst A.L., Noller K.L., et al. Urogenital abnormalities in men exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a cohort study. Environ. Health. 2009;8:37. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Pan G., Hanaoka T., Yoshimura M., et al. Decreased serum free testosterone in workers exposed to high levels of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP): a cross-sectional study in China. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006;114:1643–1648. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Patel D.P., Punjani N., Guo J., et al. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 on male reproduction and men's health. Fertil. Steril. 2021;S0015–0282(20):32780–32781. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ponzo O.J., Silvia C. Evidence of reproductive disruption associated with neuroendocrine changes induced by UV-B filters, phthalates and nonylphenol during sexual maturation in rats of both gender. Toxicology. 2013;311:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Purdue M.P., Engel L.S., Langseth H., et al. Prediagnostic serum concentrations of organochlorine compounds and risk of testicular germ cell tumors. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009;117:1514–1519. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rastrelli G., Di Stasi V., Inglese F., et al. Low testosterone levels predict clinical adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients. Andrology. 2021;9(1):88–98. doi: 10.1111/andr.12821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Rignell-Hydbom A., Rylander L., Giwercman A., et al. Exposure to PCBs and p,p'-DDE and human sperm chromatin integrity. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005;113:175–179. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rudel R.A., Camann D.E., Spengler J.D., et al. Phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and other endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air and dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003;37:4543–4553. doi: 10.1021/es0264596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Salian S., Doshi T., Vanage G. Neonatal exposure of male rats to Bisphenol A impairs fertility and expression of Sertoli cell junctional proteins in the testis. Toxicology. 2009;265:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Sansone A., Mollaioli D., Ciocca G., et al. Addressing male sexual and reproductive health in the wake of COVID-19 outbreak. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2021;44(2):223–231. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01350-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schecter A., Papke O., Tung K.C., et al. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers contamination of United States food. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:5306–5311. doi: 10.1021/es0490830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Schroeder M., Tuku B., Jarczak D., et al. The majority of male patients with COVID-19 present low testosterone levels on admission to Intensive Care in Hamburg, Germany: a retrospective cohort study. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.05.07.20073817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Selvaraj K., Ravichandran S., Krishnan S., et al. Testicular atrophy and hypothalamic pathology in COVID-19: possibility of the incidence of male infertility and HPG Axis Abnormalities. Reprod. Sci. 2021:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00441-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sengupta P., Dutta S. COVID-19 and hypogonadism: secondary immune responses rule-over endocrine mechanisms. Hum. Fertil. 2021:1–6. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1867902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Setchell K.D., Zimmer-Nechemias L., Cai J., et al. Isoflavone content of infant formulas and the metabolic fate of these phytoestrogens in early life. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;68:1453S–1461S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.6.1453S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sikka S.C. Relative impact of oxidative stress on male reproductive function. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001;8:851–862. doi: 10.2174/0929867013373039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sikka S.C. Bioenvironmental Issues Affecting Men's Reproductive and Sexual Health. Academic Press; 2018. Environment, drugs, and chemical exposures in the realm of human sexuality; pp. 459–474. [Google Scholar]
  88. Sikka S.C., Swerdloff R.S., Rajfer J. Assay system for simultaneous measurement of three steroidogenic enzyme activities in rat and human testis: effect of human chorionic gonadotropin. Anal. Biochem. 1986;149:72–86. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90478-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Sinclair S. Male infertility: nutritional and environmental considerations. Altern. Med. Rev. 2000;5:28–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Singh S., Li S.S. Epigenetic effects of environmental chemicals bisphenol A and phthalates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:10143–10153. doi: 10.3390/ijms130810143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Skakkebaek N.E., Rajpert-De Meyts E., Jorgensen N., et al. Germ cell cancer and disorders of spermatogenesis: an environmental connection? APMIS. 1998;106:3–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1998.tb01314.x. (discussion 12) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Skakkebaek N.E., Rajpert-De Meyts E., Main K.M. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum. Reprod. 2001;16:972–978. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Soares A., Guieysse B., Jefferson B., et al. Nonylphenol in the environment: a critical review on occurrence, fate, toxicity and treatment in wastewaters. Environ. Int. 2008;34:1033–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Spano M., Seli E., Bizzaro D., et al. The significance of sperm nuclear DNA strand breaks on reproductive outcome. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005;17:255–260. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000169102.77504.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Svechnikov K., Landreh L., Weisser J., et al. Origin, development and regulation of human Leydig cells. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2010;73:93–101. doi: 10.1159/000277141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Takahashi S., Chi X.J., Yamaguchi Y., et al. Mutagenicity of bisphenol A and its suppression by interferon-alpha in human RSa cells. Mutat. Res. 2001;490:199–207. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(00)00161-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Temiz M.Z., Dincer M.M., Hacibey I., et al. Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 in semen samples and the effects of COVID-19 on male sexual health by using semen analysis and serum male hormone profile: a cross-sectional, pilot study. Andrologia. 2021;53(2) doi: 10.1111/and.13912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Tessier D.M., Matsumura F. Increased ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase activity, MAPK phosphorylation, and cell proliferation in the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP following treatment by select pesticides. Toxicol. Sci. 2001;60:38–43. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/60.1.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Tian Y., Zhou L.Q. Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on male reproduction. Reproduction. 2021;161(2):R37–R44. doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Toppari J., Larsen J.C., Christiansen P., et al. Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens. Environ. Health Perspect. 1996;104(Suppl. 4):741–803. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s4741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Vandenberg L.N., Chahoud I., Heindel J.J., et al. Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010;118:1055–1070. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Virtanen H.E., Adamsson A. Cryptorchidism and endocrine disrupting chemicals. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012;355:208–220. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Welshons W.V., Thayer K.A., Judy B.M., et al. Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003;111:994–1006. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Wong E.W., Cheng C.Y. Polarity proteins and cell-cell interactions in the testis. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009;278:309–353. doi: 10.1016/S1937-6448(09)78007-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wright C., Milne S., Leeson H. Sperm DNA damage caused by oxidative stress: modifiable clinical, lifestyle and nutritional factors in male infertility. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2014;28:684–703. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Wu X., Groves F.D., McLaughlin C.C., et al. Cancer incidence patterns among adolescents and young adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:309–320. doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-4026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES