Table 1.

GSEA results on clusters from UMAP plot inFigure 3B

Comparing pair	KEGG gene set name	Gene set size	NES	P value	FDR
Cluster 2 vs. rest	Glycolysis gluconeogenesis	13	4.23	0	0
	Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection	14	3.63	0	0
	Alzheimer’s disease	20	3.97	0	0
	Tight junction	16	3.03	0.004	0.0063
Cluster 3 vs. rest	Oocyte meiosis	15	3.75	0	0
	Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection	14	3.48	0.001	0.0315
	Cell cycle	20	3.13	0.002	0.042
	Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis	12	3.29	0.005	0.0787
Cluster 4 vs. rest	Spliceosome	13	3.84	0	0
	Viral myocarditis	25	3.23	0.002	0.042
Cluster 5 vs. rest	Alzheimer’s disease	20	3.08	0	0
	Antigen processing and presentation	30	2.51	0.003	0.0472
	MAPK signaling pathway	45	2.91	0	0
	Glycolysis gluconeogenesis	13	2.49	0.043	0.198
	Spliceosome	13	2.99	0.004	0.0504

Note: GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; NES, normalized enrichment score; FDR, false detection rate.