Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2020 Aug;29(8):671–680. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001571

Figure 6:

Figure 6:

Additional information for Figure 5AB shows TD and PD from the 24–2 (A) and from the 10–2 (B), while (C) shows a research version of a new Spectralis report (Heidelberg Engr. Inc.) that provides the pie charts for the cRNFL, BMO-MRW, as well as the thickness probability plots for both the RGC and RNFL. The superior hemidisc shows structural disagreement that was deemed a cRNFL FP upon post-hoc analysis, as, based upon the RS, the superior hemidisc was normal. Lack of any clear damage on either the VFs (i.e., both fields were normal), as well as the lack of any significant damage within the superior retina points to a lack of glaucomatous damage.