Table 1.
Adjusted estimated refusal rates by training uptake at various locations in recreational marijuana stores
| Variable | Baseline | 3-month follow-up | 9-month follow-up |
| Training uptake—Any employee trained (entire sample n = 175 stores, 1,007 visits) | |||
| Entrance (p = .162)a | |||
| Not trained | 76.8% | 83.6% | 85.8% |
| Trained | 66.4% | 83.1% | 80.5% |
| Entrance or floor (p = .411)a | |||
| Not trained | 90.5% | 94.0% | 94.3% |
| Trained | 83.5% | 93.3% | 91.1% |
| Overall (entrance, floor, or counter) (p = .525)a | |||
| Not trained | 94.3% | 95.8% | 97.7% |
| Trained | 90.8% | 96.3% | 95.9% |
| Training uptake—Any employee trained (intervention group only n = 100 stores, 581 visits) | |||
| Entrance (p = .020)a | |||
| Not trained | 82.6% | 83.1% | 84.5% |
| Trained | 65.9% | 82.5% | 79.9% |
| Entrance or floor (p = .243)a | |||
| Not trained | 90.8% | 90.5% | 92.0% |
| Trained | 84.1% | 93.9% | 91.6% |
| Overall (entrance, floor, or counter) (p = .393)a | |||
| Not trained | 93.8% | 93.7% | 98.4% |
| Trained | 91.2% | 96.8% | 96.0% |
| Training uptake—Percentage of employees trained in store (entire sample n = 175 stores, 1,007 visits) | |||
| Entrance (p = .033)a | |||
| 0% | 61.3% | 67.7% | 70.2% |
| 20% | 58.3% | 68.2% | 68.9% |
| 40% | 55.4% | 68.7% | 67.6% |
| 60% | 52.4% | 69.2% | 66.4% |
| 80% | 49.4% | 69.6% | 65.1% |
| 100% | 46.4% | 70.1% | 63.8% |
| Parameter estimate | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
| Entrance or floor (p = .274)a | |||
| 0% | 84.9% | 88.4% | 88.9% |
| 20% | 83.3% | 88.7% | 88.2% |
| 40% | 81.7% | 89.1% | 87.5% |
| 60% | 80.1% | 89.4% | 86.8% |
| 80% | 78.4% | 89.8% | 86.1% |
| 100% | 76.8% | 90.2% | 85.4% |
| Parameter estimate | -0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| Overall (entrance, floor, or counter) (p = .434)a | |||
| 0% | 92.4% | 93.9% | 95.9% |
| 20% | 91.5% | 94.2% | 95.5% |
| 40% | 90.6% | 94.5% | 95.0% |
| 60% | 89.7% | 94.8% | 94.6% |
| 80% | 88.8% | 95.1% | 94.2% |
| 100% | 87.9% | 95.3% | 93.7% |
| Parameter estimate | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| Training uptake—Percentage of employees trained in store (intervention group only n = 100 stores, 581 visits) | |||
| Entrance (p = .004)a | |||
| 0% | 57.8% | 58.4% | 60.4% |
| 20% | 53.3% | 58.9% | 59.2% |
| 40% | 49.1% | 59.4% | 58.0% |
| 60% | 44.8% | 59.9% | 56.9% |
| 80% | 40.5% | 60.4% | 55.7% |
| 100% | 36.2% | 60.91% | 54.5% |
| Parameter estimate | -0.16 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
| Entrance or floor (p = .192)a | |||
| 0% | 81.8% | 82.0% | 83.7% |
| 20% | 80.2% | 83.2% | 83.6% |
| 40% | 78.8% | 84.4% | 83.5% |
| 60% | 77.3% | 85.6% | 83.3% |
| 80% | 75.8% | 86.8% | 83.2% |
| 100% | 74.3% | 88.0% | 83.1% |
| Parameter estimate | -0.07 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
| Overall (entrance, floor, or counter) (p = .390)a | |||
| 0% | 90.4% | 90.7% | 94.9% |
| 20% | 89.7% | 91.5% | 94.3% |
| 40% | 89.0% | 92.2% | 93.8% |
| 60% | 88.3% | 93.0% | 93.3% |
| 80% | 87.6% | 93.7% | 92.8% |
| 100% | 86.9% | 94.5% | 92.2% |
| Parameter estimate | -0.01 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
Notes: Percentages can exceed 100% because of adjustment for covariates.
a
Two-way interaction among training uptake and assessment round, adjusted for state (Washington State vs. Colorado), type of store (recreational cannabis sales only vs. recreational and medical sales) and region (metropolitan area vs. outlying areas); two tailed p value.