Table 1.
Criteria and sub-criteria applied to evaluate the utility of biomass denominators in the FDA, ESVAC, PHAC and OIE methodologies
Criteria | Sub-criteria | Notation | Definition |
---|---|---|---|
Level of detail (resolution) accounted for in the estimated animal biomass (Which biomass estimate provides the highest resolution in the estimated US livestock biomass?) | Granularity | G | Number of specific animal production categories considered for each species |
Comprehensiveness | C | Capacity to collect population data for all animals of a species | |
Accuracy | A | Use of actual treatment weight data per species | |
| |||
Comparability: practicality in biomass estimation for comparison across countries (Can we estimate animal biomass to compare sales across countries?) | Standardized parameters | Sp | Use of standardized values for estimating animal biomass |
Data uniformity | Du | Availability of centralized sources for data collection | |
| |||
Ability of observing trends in animal biomass within a country (Can we observe trends over time?) | Stability in population | So | Size and structure of population at risk of being treated correct for changes over time |
Stability in weights | Sw | Weight of animals at risk of being treated correct for changes over time |