Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 23;77(3):827–842. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab441

Table 1.

Criteria and sub-criteria applied to evaluate the utility of biomass denominators in the FDA, ESVAC, PHAC and OIE methodologies

Criteria Sub-criteria Notation Definition
Level of detail (resolution) accounted for in the estimated animal biomass (Which biomass estimate provides the highest resolution in the estimated US livestock biomass?) Granularity G Number of specific animal production categories considered for each species
Comprehensiveness C Capacity to collect population data for all animals of a species
Accuracy A Use of actual treatment weight data per species

Comparability: practicality in biomass estimation for comparison across countries (Can we estimate animal biomass to compare sales across countries?) Standardized parameters Sp Use of standardized values for estimating animal biomass
Data uniformity Du Availability of centralized sources for data collection

Ability of observing trends in animal biomass within a country (Can we observe trends over time?) Stability in population So Size and structure of population at risk of being treated correct for changes over time
Stability in weights Sw Weight of animals at risk of being treated correct for changes over time