Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD005119. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005119.pub2

Cameron 2004.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: randomised controlled trial 
 LOCATION AND SETTING: Community (Twin register), Australia 
 DURATION OF SUPPLEMENTATION: 2 years 
 DURATION OF FOLLOW‐UP: 2 years 
 QUALITY ASSESSMENT: Moderate risk of bias 
 RANDOMISED: States random but no description 
 ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT: Not described or unclear 
 BLINDING OF SUBJECT: Yes 
 DESCRIPTION OF WITHDRAWALS/DROPOUTS: Yes
TYPE OF ANALYSIS: Available Data 
 COMPLIANCE: Assessed 
 CONFOUNDERS MEASURED: spontaneous calcium intake, physical activity, medical history and medication use.
Participants N SCREENED: unknown 
 N RANDOMISED: 128 
 N COMPLETED: 104 (6 months); 48 (2 years) 
 M=0% 
 F=100% 
 ETHNICITY: unknown 
 MEAN BASELINE AGE (yrs): 10.3 
 BASELINE AGE RANGE (yrs): 8‐13 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: premenarcheal female twins 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: nil 
 BASELINE CALCIUM INTAKE (mg/day): 716 
 PUBERTAL STAGE: prepubertal
Interventions 1. Calcium carbonate 1200 mg 
 2. Placebo 
 CO‐INTERVENTIONS: Nil
Outcomes BONE MEASURES: SITES 
 AREAL BONE MINERAL DENSITY: total hip, femoral neck, total forearm and L2‐4 vertebrae. 
 BONE MINERAL CONTENT: total body 
 METHOD OF MEASUREMENT: DXA 
 FOLLOW‐UP ASSESSMENT POINTS(yrs): 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 
 OTHER OUTCOMES MEASURED: weight, height, fat mass, lean mass 
 BONE MEASURES INCLUDED IN ANALYSES: 
 AREAL BONE MINERAL DENSITY: total hip, femoral neck, total forearm and L2‐4 vertebrae. 
 BONE MINERAL CONTENT: total body 
 SUB‐GROUPS IDENTIFIED: Menarche vs premenarche
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear