Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;10(2):e4130. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004130

Table 1.

Patient Demographics, Perforator Used, and the Surgical Outcome

No. Age Gender BMI Smoking History Etiology Defect Size (Flap Size) Perforator Used Venous Congestion Partial or Total Flap Necrosis
1 27 y Woman 25 No Trauma 1.5 × 2 cm Proximal No No
2 28 y Man 27 Yes Trauma 1.8 × 1.9 cm Distal No No
3 44 y Man 20 Yes Trauma 2 × 2 cm Proximal No No
4 30 y Woman 19 No Contracture release 2 × 2.3 cm Proximal No No
5 33 y Man 22 No Trauma 1.8 × 2.4 cm Proximal No No
6 23 y Man 30 No Trauma 1.9 × 2 cm Distal No No
7 32 y Woman 32 No Trauma 2.3 × 2.5 cm Distal Yes No
8 30 y Man 27 Yes Trauma 2 × 2.2 cm Proximal No No
9 35 y Man 19 Yes Contracture release 1.9 × 1.8 cm Distal No No
10 29 y Man 20 No Trauma 1.7 × 2.2 cm Distal No No
11 29 y Woman 22 No Trauma 1.7 × 1.9 cm Distal No No
12 40 y Man 24 Yes Trauma 2 × 2.3 cm Proximal No No
13 25 y Woman 21 No Tumor excision 2 × 2.2 cm Distal No Partial
14 33 y Man 28 No Trauma 1.5 × 1.9 cm Proximal No No
15 32 y Man 26 No Trauma 1.3 × 2.4 cm Distal No No
16 28 y Woman 24 No Trauma 2 × 1.8 cm Proximal No No
17 25 y Man 27 No Contracture release 1.7 × 2 cm Distal No No
18 50 y Man 28 Yes Trauma 1.8 × 1.7 cm Proximal No No
19 36 y Woman 30 No Trauma 2 × 2.3 cm Proximal No No
20 48 y Man 29 No Tumor excision 2.4 × 2.3 cm Distal Yes No