Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 10;18(2):e1009222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009222

Fig 10. Model comparison.

Fig 10

(A) BIC scores for each model relative to the BIC score for the Hybrid model for each participant. For each model, each circle corresponds to one participant. Positive numbers imply the fit favors the Hybrid model, negative numbers imply that the fit favors the other model. A ΔBIC value of > 10 (indicated by the dotted line) is considered “very strong” evidence implied by very high posterior odds (P(MHybridData) > 0.99) [48]. (B) The number of participants best fit by each model. 28 out of 30 participants were best fit by the Hybrid model, suggesting that this model best describes human behavior.