Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2022 Feb 23;7(1):e00892-21. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00892-21

Bbvac: A Live Vaccine Candidate That Provides Long-Lasting Anamnestic and Th17-Mediated Immunity against the Three Classical Bordetella spp.

Monica C Gestal a,*,✉,#, Laura K Howard a,#, Kalyan K Dewan a, Eric T Harvill a,
Editor: Robert A Brittonb
PMCID: PMC8865921  PMID: 35196124

ABSTRACT

Acute pathogens such as Bordetella pertussis can cause severe disease but are ultimately cleared by the immune response. This has led to the accepted paradigm that convalescent immunity is optimal and therefore broadly accepted as the “gold standard” against which vaccine candidates should be compared. However, successful pathogens like B. pertussis have evolved multiple mechanisms for suppressing and evading host immunity, raising the possibility that disruption of these mechanisms could result in substantially stronger or better immunity. Current acellular B. pertussis vaccines, delivered in a 5-dose regimen, induce only short-term immunity against disease and even less against colonization and transmission. Importantly, they provide modest protection against other Bordetella species that cause substantial human disease. A universal vaccine that protects against the three classical Bordetella spp. could decrease the burden of whooping cough-like disease in humans and other animals. Our recent work demonstrated that Bordetella spp. suppress host inflammatory responses and that disrupting the regulation of immunosuppressive mechanisms can allow the host to generate substantially stronger sterilizing immunity against the three classical Bordetella spp. Here, we identify immune parameters impacted by Bordetella species immunomodulation, including the generation of robust Th17 and B cell memory responses. Disrupting immunomodulation augmented the immune response, providing strong protection against the prototypes of all three classical Bordetella spp. as well as recent clinical isolates. Importantly, the protection in mice lasted for at least 15 months and was associated with recruitment of high numbers of B and T cells in the lungs as well as enhanced Th17 mucosal responses and persistently high titers of antibodies. These findings demonstrate that disrupting bacterial immunomodulatory pathways can generate much stronger and more protective immune responses to infection, with important implications for the development of better vaccines.

IMPORTANCE Infectious diseases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, accounting for over 40 million hospitalizations since 1998. Therefore, novel vaccine strategies are imperative, which can be improved with a better understanding of the mechanisms that bacteria utilize to suppress host immunity, a key mechanism for establishing colonization. Bordetella spp., the causative agents of whooping cough, suppress host immunity, which allows for persistent colonization. We discovered a regulator of a bacterial immunosuppressive pathway, which, when mutated in Bordetella spp., allows for rapid clearance of infection and subsequent generation of protective immunity for at least 15 months. After infection with the mutant strain, mice exhibited sterilizing immunity against the three classical Bordetella spp., suggesting that the immune response can be both stronger and cross-protective. This work presents a strategy for vaccine development that can be applied to other immunomodulatory pathogens.

KEYWORDS: Bordetella bronchiseptica, Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis, vaccine, mucosal immunity, antibodies, Bordetella, immunity, mucosal vaccines

INTRODUCTION

The classical Bordetella spp. are respiratory pathogens that can cause disease in humans (Bordetella pertussis, B. parapertussis) or a broad variety of mammals, including humans (B. bronchiseptica) (13). They are the causative agents of whooping cough or whooping cough-like disease, and, despite the international vaccination efforts to eradicate this disease, incidence has increased since the move to acellular vaccines (46). Current acellular vaccines are very safe and efficient in preventing severe symptoms of disease but are not able to prevent colonization of the nasal cavity and subsequent transmission to new hosts (7, 8). In addition, the immunity they produce wanes relatively rapidly (911), and there is growing evidence of vaccine-driven evolution of key vaccine antigens, leading to fears of even larger outbreaks (1214). In 2014, the number of cases of whooping cough was estimated to be over 24 million worldwide (15), underscoring the imperative need for new and improved vaccines. Recent novel vaccine strategies have included new antigens and adjuvants (16), the use of live vaccines (1721), and the use of outer membrane vesicles (2224, 53). These efforts are focused on B. pertussis, although this is not the only Bordetella sp. that causes disease in humans. In the particular case of B. bronchiseptica, this is not only a problem in dogs that need to be vaccinated every 6 to 12 months (2530, 54), but also in other animals, including pigs (3137), causing increased morbidity in farm animals. Moreover, zoonoses from these animals have been also reported, indicating that there is a need for a universal vaccine. Fortunately, it has been shown that B. bronchiseptica can confer protection against another Bordetella spp. (38), providing an alternative for the development of novel vaccines against whooping cough-like disease.

In our previous work, we investigated the molecular mechanisms that Bordetella spp. utilize to respond to host inflammatory signals. We identified a sigma factor named btrS that increases expression of virulence factors in the presence of blood/serum (1), indicating that it might be involved in the response to host inflammation. To investigate the role of this sigma factor in modulating host immunity, we challenged mice with the parent strain, RB50, or an isogenic mutant lacking btrS (Bbvac). Our results revealed that Bbvac is cleared more rapidly from the respiratory tract and triggers faster and more robust Th17 immunity (3). When complemented with a plasmid-bearing intact btrS, persistent lung infection was largely restored.

Here, we characterize this mutant with disrupted immunomodulation (Bbvac) as a potential live vaccine, demonstrating that it induces sterilizing immunity against all three classical Bordetella spp., something the existing vaccines cannot do (39). Moreover, B. bronchiseptica is genetically stable and does not cause disease in immunocompetent humans, providing a high level of safety. In mice, Bbvac induced robust long-lasting protection for at least 15 months, which involved a combination of antibody and cellular Th17 responses that protected against both laboratory strains and recent clinical isolates of all three classical Bordetella spp.

RESULTS

Bbvac provides more robust protective immunity than classical Bordetella spp. vaccines or convalescent immunity.

Our previous data revealed that a B. bronchiseptica mutant lacking btrS (RB50ΔbtrS), here Bbvac, fails to suppress host immune responses, resulting in anamnestic protective immunity against reinfection with either B. pertussis, B. bronchiseptica, or B. parapertussis (3). To evaluate if the protection conferred by Bbvac is greater than the gold standard, which is the protection provided by convalescent immunity, groups of mice were challenged with wild-type B. pertussis (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), B. bronchiseptica, or Bbvac and allowed to clear infection (antibiotics were provided after 28 days to clear B. bronchiseptica) to induce anamnestic immunity. Current commercially available vaccines were also included in this experiment, and additional groups of mice were vaccinated with the acellular vaccine Adacel (purple) or the veterinary live attenuated vaccine Nobivac (green). Mice sham vaccinated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; black) served as controls. Ninety days after vaccination/first challenge, mice were intranasally inoculated with wild-type B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 1A), B. pertussis (Fig. 1B), or B. parapertussis (Fig. 1C) with the standard inoculum (5 × 105 CFU in 50 μL PBS) (3). On day 7 postinoculation (coinciding with the peak of infection) (40), mice were euthanized to enumerate bacterial burden in the nasal cavity, trachea, and lungs.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Bbvac confers sterilizing immunity against infection with the 3 classical Bordetella spp. C57BL/6J mice were intranasally inoculated with PBS (black) or PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. bronchiseptica (blue), Nobivac (green), or Bbvac (red). Another group was intraperitoneally vaccinated with 1/5 of Adacel (purple). Ninety days later, mice were intranasally challenged with PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. bronchiseptica (A), B. pertussis (B), or B. parapertussis (C). Mice were euthanized 7 days postinoculation, and colonies were enumerated in the respiratory tract. Two-way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple-comparison test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. n = 4 per condition.

FIG S1

Bbvac confers better protection against B. pertussis than convalescence immunity. C57BL/6J mice were intranasally inoculated with PBS (black) or PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. bronchiseptica (blue), B. pertussis (purple), or Bbvac (red). The other group was intraperitoneally vaccinated with 1/5 of Adacel (green) and boosted 14 days later. Ninety days postinoculation/vaccination, mice were intranasally challenged with PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. pertussis. Mice were euthanized 7 days postinoculation, and colonies were enumerated in the respiratory tract. n = 4 per condition. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.9 MB (2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The PBS sham vaccinated group (black) presented high numbers of bacteria with small to moderate variability in lungs, trachea, and nasal cavity following challenge with B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 1A), B. pertussis (Fig. 1B), and B. parapertussis (Fig. 1C). Vaccination with the current acellular vaccine Adacel (purple) robustly protected the lower respiratory tract from all three classical Bordetella spp., with one outlier discussed below. But Adacel was less protective against colonization of trachea or nasal cavity, as previously reported for mice (3), baboons (41, 42), and humans (7, 43). The veterinary vaccine, Nobivac (green), conferred only limited protection against B. bronchiseptica in nose, and variably in trachea and lungs, but did not completely clear the infection. Interestingly, Nobivac fully protected the lungs against infection with B. pertussis or B. parapertussis but had no detected effect on their numbers in trachea or nose. These data indicate that vaccination with commercially available vaccines, either Adacel or Nobivac, reduced numbers of bacteria in the lungs but did not protect the upper respiratory tract, which likely allows the bacteria to continue to be shed and transmitted. These results are consistent with observations that current vaccines can prevent severe forms of disease but do not prevent colonization, shedding, and transmission.

Examining convalescent immunity, the current gold standard of protective immunity, previous infection with B. bronchiseptica (blue) protected the lung against reinfection with B. bronchiseptica, B. pertussis, or B. parapertussis. However, protection was less strong in the trachea and was nominal or absent in the nasal cavity, indicating that convalescent immunity protects the lower respiratory tract but not middle and upper. Previous infection with B. pertussis (Fig. S1) conferred limited protection against B. pertussis and B. parapertussis in all three organs, allowing for colonization in middle and upper respiratory tracts. These data, similar to previously published results (44), indicate that convalescent immunity following infection with B. bronchiseptica or B. pertussis confers some level of protection against disease, especially in lower and middle respiratory tracts, but still allows for colonization of the nasal cavity.

Importantly, Bbvac (red) conferred sterilizing immunity against all three classical Bordetella spp., with none of the 105 CFU inoculated bacteria detected in the respiratory tract, thereby outperforming not only the currently available vaccines but also convalescent immunity induced by either B. bronchiseptica or B. pertussis. These results belie the concept of convalescent immunity as the gold standard of best achievable protection against which vaccines should be measured and reveal that much better protective immunity can be achieved.

Bbvac induces sterilizing immunity against diverse clinical isolates of B. bronchiseptica.

The evidence that Bbvac confers better protection against reinfection than convalescent immunity induced by prior infection with wild-type B. bronchiseptica or B. pertussis suggests potentially important clinical application as a live vaccine. To evaluate efficacy against clinical isolates, mice were intranasally vaccinated with Bbvac 3 and 7 months prior to challenge with 17 different clinical isolates of B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 2; Fig. S2; Table S2) (3, 45). Mice were euthanized at day 7 postchallenge, and bacterial numbers were enumerated in the respiratory tract.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Bbvac confers robust protection against clinical isolates of B. bronchiseptica. C57BL/6J mice were intranasally vaccinated with PBS or PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of Bbvac. Three (A) and 7 (B) months after vaccination, mice were intranasally challenged with PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of different clinical isolates of B. bronchiseptica. Mice were euthanized 7 days postinoculation, and colonies were enumerated in the respiratory tract. Two-way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple-comparison test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. n = 4 per strain and condition.

FIG S2

Bbvac confers robust protection against clinical isolates of B. bronchiseptica. C57BL/6J mice were vaccinated with PBS (black) or PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of Bbvac (red). Ninety days later, mice were intranasally challenged with PBS containing 5 × 105 of a clinical isolate of B. bronchiseptica (a total of 12 different clinical isolates were tested). Mice were euthanized at day 7 postinfection, and colonies were enumerated in the respiratory tract. Two-way ANOVA was performed. **, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. n = 4 mice per strain and condition. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.4 MB (393.8KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Clinical isolates included in this study. List of clinical Bordetella spp. strains utilized to determine protection levels conferred by Bbvac. This table indicates if the strains were used to test protection at 3 months, 7 months, or both. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (17.2KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Mice vaccinated with Bbvac 3 months earlier completely cleared all challenged clinical isolates from the lungs and had only very low levels of colonization in the trachea for one strain (Fig. 2A). Bacteria were detected in the nasal cavity, but the numbers were, on average, >99% reduced and, in all cases, >90% lower than the nonvaccinated group, greatly reducing the likelihood of bacterial shedding and further disease transmission. Importantly, disease is associated with bacteria in the trachea and lungs, where Bbvac reduced numbers of all strains by >99.9%, eliminating all, or nearly all, of this large inoculum within 7 days.

To determine long-term protection, we infected mice with the same clinical strains 7 months after Bbvac vaccination. Seven days after conventional challenge (50 μL of PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU), less than 1% of the inoculated dose of any B. bronchiseptica strains remained (Fig. 2B). The lungs were completely protected, and the trachea was largely protected from all strains. Bbvac reduced numbers of all strains of B. bronchiseptica in the nose to a few thousand, a 99% reduction from the initial inoculum. These data indicate that even after 7 months post-Bbvac vaccination, there is complete protection of the lower respiratory tract and substantial protection in all respiratory organs. Overall, these data indicate that Bbvac confers lasting protection against diverse laboratory and clinical strains.

Bbvac provides long-lasting immunity against classical Bordetella spp.

Our data demonstrating high levels of protection at even 7 months postvaccination are very promising, as one of the greatest concerns with the current acellular vaccines is that the immunity induced wanes quite rapidly (7) and that this is leading to an increase in the numbers of young adults that are suffering from whooping cough. Estimations of Tdap effectiveness within 2 years of vaccination revealed a 57.6% to 74.4% protection, indicating a decrease in effectiveness and limited duration of immunity (46). To investigate the length of protection, mice were vaccinated with Bbvac, and 3, 7, and 15 months postvaccination, we challenged them with B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 3A, B, and C), B. pertussis (Fig. 3D, E, and F), or B. parapertussis (Fig. 3G, H, and I). At 7 days postinoculation, mice were euthanized, and bacteria in respiratory organs were enumerated.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Bbvac confers robust protection for at least 15 months postvaccination. C57BL/6J mice were intranasally vaccinated with PBS (black) or PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of Bbvac (red). Seven and 15 months after vaccination, mice were intranasally challenged with PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. bronchiseptica (A, B, and C), B. pertussis (D, E, and F), or B. parapertussis (G, H, and I). Mice were euthanized 7 days postinoculation, and colonies were enumerated in the respiratory tract. Two-way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple-comparison test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. n = 4 per strain and condition.

The sham vaccinated mice (black) had high levels of colonization in nasal cavity trachea and lungs following infection with the 3 classical Bordetella spp. Vaccination with Bbvac conferred sterilizing immunity of the nasal cavity against B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 3A), B. pertussis (Fig. 3D), and B. parapertussis (Fig. 3G) for at least 7 months postvaccination. Moreover, at 15 months postvaccination, Bbvac provided sterilizing immunity against B. bronchiseptica and B. pertussis in trachea and lungs and reduced numbers in the nasal cavity by >99%. It was similarly effective against B. parapertussis in the lungs but, interestingly, had no impact on the relatively low B. parapertussis numbers in the nasal cavity or trachea.

Excitingly, Bbvac vaccination provided at least 15 months of complete protection against B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 3C), B. pertussis (Fig. 3H), and B. parapertussis (Fig. 3I) in the lungs, where nearly all pathology is concentrated in this model. Even after 15 months (most of the life span of mice), there was only partial loss of protection against B. bronchiseptica and B. pertussis in the nose, but complete loss of protection against B. pertussis in both trachea and nose. Overall, these results demonstrate that Bbvac confers profound, protective immunity against lower respiratory tract disease caused by all three classical species. Even at 15 months postvaccination, there is near-complete protection in the lower respiratory tract, better than that conferred by commercial vaccines 3 months postvaccination or even that conferred by prior infection (Fig. 1).

Bbvac promotes the generation of high-titer and long-lasting antibodies.

To evaluate how protection in the long-term experiments above correlates to antibody titers, we compared serum collected from the above Bbvac vaccinated mice at 3, 7, and 15 months postvaccination. We did not evaluate antibody titers for currently available vaccines, as this information is well established in the literature (8, 47, 48), and our previous data (Fig. 1) showed that protection is not as robust as that conferred by Bbvac. To evaluate circulating total IgG levels, serum was collected at day 7 (coinciding with the peak of infection) from the 3-, 7- or 15-month vaccinated mice following intranasal challenge with B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 4A), B. pertussis (Fig. 4B), or B. parapertussis (Fig. 4C).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Bbvac promotes α-bordetellae antibodies for at least 15 months. C57BL/6J mice were intranasally vaccinated with PBS (black) or PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of Bbvac (colors). Three, 7, and 15 months after vaccination, mice were intranasally challenged with PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. bronchiseptica (A), B. pertussis (B), or B. parapertussis (C). Mice were euthanized 7 days postinoculation, and sera were collected for analysis. Antibody titers were determined to be reciprocal of the lowest dilution in which an OD of 0.1 was obtained. Mann-Whitney test was performed. ****, P < 0.0001. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. n = 4 per strain and condition.

As expected, the naive uninfected control mice (Black) had low titers (∼100) of antibodies against the three Bordetella species, B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 4A), B. pertussis (Fig. 4B), and B. parapertussis (Fig. 4C). The Bbvac-vaccinated group presented very high titer (>100,000) of antibodies against B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 4A), B. pertussis (Fig. 4B), and B. parapertussis (Fig. 4C) at 3, 7, and 15 months postvaccination, indicating that Bbvac induces the generation of IgG antibodies that recognize all three classical Bordetella species and that these titers persist, or can be rapidly recalled, for at least 15 months.

To investigate if the antibody profile generated by Bbvac was different than that conferred by convalescent immunity or vaccination with the currently available vaccines, we performed Western blot analysis using sera from convalescent/vaccinated mice as primary antibody and whole-cell extract of B. bronchiseptica, B. pertussis, and B. parapertussis as antigens (Fig. S3). Bbvac serum antibodies recognized a broader and more diverse set of antigens than those generated by convalescent immunity or vaccination with Adacel or Nobivac, suggesting that BtrS suppresses the generation of antibodies to diverse antigens. Overall, these results demonstrate that vaccination with Bbvac induces the production of long-lasting IgG (Fig. 4) and more diverse (Fig. S3) systemic anti-Bordetella IgG antibodies, suggesting that humoral immunity might contribute to the robust protection conferred by Bbvac.

FIG S3

Bbvac generates more diverse a-Bordetellae antibodies. C57BL/6J mice were vaccinated with different commercially available vaccines and challenged with B. bronchiseptica or B. pertussis, vaccinated with Bbvac, or unvaccinated. Three months after vaccination, serum was collected and used as primary antibody for Western blot analysis. All the sections of the membrane were incubated together with the secondary antibody to promote binding competition (for each figure separately). We developed each panel to compare intensity. The results show the IgG antibody profile generated in mice against B. bronchiseptica (A) and B. pertussis (B). n = 3. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.9 MB (2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Bbvac-induced antibodies confer protection against challenge with B. pertussis and B. bronchiseptica.

Our results show that Bbvac provides broad, robust, and more persistent protection than that provided by currently available vaccines or by wild-type B. bronchiseptica-induced convalescent immunity. To examine the relative contributions of circulating antibodies to protection, mice were vaccinated with Bbvac (red), B. bronchiseptica (blue), B. pertussis (orange), Nobivac (green), or Adacel (purple). Three months postvaccination, serum was collected. One hundred fifty microliters of serum was then adoptively transferred to naive mice intraperitoneally 3 h before inoculation with 50 μL of PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. bronchiseptica. (Fig. 5A) or B. pertussis (Fig. 5B). Mice were euthanized at 7 days postinoculation to enumerate bacteria in the respiratory tract.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Bbvac-induced antibodies confer some protection against infection with B. bronchiseptica and B. pertussis. Serum from mice that were naive (α-naïve), inoculated with B. bronchiseptica (α-BB), inoculated with B. pertussis (α-BP), vaccinated with Nobivac (α-Nobivac), vaccinated with Adacel (α-Adacel), or vaccinated with Bbvac (α-Bbvac) was transferred to naive C57BL/6J mice. Three hours later, mice were intranasally challenged with B. bronchiseptica (A) or B. pertussis (B), and mice were euthanized 7 days postinoculation to enumerate colonies in the respiratory tract. Two-way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple-comparison test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. n = 4 to 9 per strain and condition.

As expected, the untreated mice (black), in which no serum was transferred, had high numbers (∼106 CFU) of bacteria in the respiratory tract following inoculation with B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 5A) or B. pertussis (Fig. 5B). Similarly, mice that received serum from naive mice (gray) also had high numbers of B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 5A) and B. pertussis (Fig. 5B). Serum from Nobivac-vaccinated mice (green) appeared to reduce numbers of B. bronchiseptica in the lungs and trachea marginally, which was found to not be statistically significant (Fig. 5A). Serum from mice vaccinated with the current acellular vaccine, Adacel (purple), reduced numbers of B. pertussis by 95 to 100% in all three organs (Fig. 5B), being especially protective in the trachea but least protective in the nose. These results are consistent with prior studies showing that these vaccines induce antibodies that protect against lower respiratory infection/disease but are less protective against colonization of the upper respiratory tract (3, 43, 49).

Antibodies transferred from convalescent mice previously infected with B. bronchiseptica (blue) reduced B. bronchiseptica numbers in the lungs (Fig. 5A) but had no effect on B. bronchiseptica numbers in the nose or trachea. Interestingly, compared to B. pertussis convalescent-phase serum, B. bronchiseptica convalescent-phase serum provides similar protection against B. pertussis along the entire respiratory tract (Fig. 5B), supporting the previously observed cross-protection (38) that warrants further investigation. Moreover, B. pertussis convalescent-phase serum (orange) also conferred protection of the lower respiratory tract but was less effective than B. bronchiseptica convalescent-phase serum in reducing B. pertussis numbers in the nose. The observation that B. pertussis-induced serum was less effective against B. pertussis than B. bronchiseptica-induced serum is intriguing and consistent with proposed and observed immunomodulation of the host response, as discussed below.

Importantly, serum transferred from Bbvac-vaccinated mice (red) provided the best protection to the lungs against B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 5A); however, the transferred sera provided little protection against B. bronchiseptica in the trachea or the nasal cavity. Serum from Bbvac-vaccinated mice also reduced B. pertussis numbers by over 99.9%, which is as well as or better than any other sera (Fig. 5B). Overall, this indicates that anti-Bbvac antibodies confer protection against challenge with B. pertussis; however, it is noteworthy that serum antibodies alone did not confer the complete protection observed in Bbvac-immune animals, implying that other immune functions are involved.

Prior Bbvac exposure elicits prompt Th17 T responses to challenge with B. parapertussis and B. bronchiseptica.

Adoptively transferred antibodies did not confer the full protection conveyed by Bbvac, consistent with the hypothesis that Th17-based cellular immunity is a critical component of the improved protection conferred by Bbvac (43, 49). To test this hypothesis, mice were vaccinated/challenged with Bbvac (red), B. bronchiseptica (blue), Adacel (purple), or Nobivac (green). Three months postvaccination, mice were challenged with B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 6A and D), B. pertussis (Fig. 6B and E), or B. parapertussis (Fig. 6C and F) as above. Seven days postinoculation, mice were euthanized and lungs dissected to compare the numbers of CD4-positive (CD4+) T cells and the fraction expressing interleukin 17 (IL-17).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Bbvac promotes IL-17+CD4+ T cells. C57BL/6J were either vaccinated with PBS, vaccinated with the currently available vaccines Nobivac and Adacel, previously infected with B. bronchiseptica, or vaccinated with Bbvac. Three months postvaccination, mice were intranasally challenged with B. bronchiseptica (A and D), B. pertussis (B and E), or B. parapertussis (C and F). Mice were euthanized 7 days postchallenge to enumerate and characterize the CD4+ T cells in the lungs. Two-way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple-comparison test. *, P < 0.05. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. n = 4 per strain and condition.

Unvaccinated and unchallenged control mice (black) presented low basal numbers of CD4+ T cells in which the number of cells producing IL-17 was also low. As expected, sham vaccination (PBS, gray) did not increase the numbers of T cells in the lungs at day 7 postinoculation. However, vaccination with the currently available vaccines resulted in an increase in CD4+ T cells, especially when it followed a challenge with B. pertussis or B. parapertussis. The veterinary vaccine, Nobivac (green), led to a moderate increase of CD4+ T cells. Vaccination with Adacel (purple) resulted in a significant increase in the numbers of CD4+ T cells after challenge with B. pertussis (Fig. 6B) and B. parapertussis (Fig. 6C). Moreover, the number of those cells that produced IL-17 was significantly higher in response to B. pertussis (Fig. 6E) but not B. parapertussis (Fig. 6F). These results indicate that the animal vaccine Nobivac does not promote an increase in the number of CD4+ IL-17+ T cells, which can explain the need for repeated vaccinations to protect dogs.

Interestingly, previous infection with B. bronchiseptica (blue) did not increase the number of CD4+ T cells (Fig. 6A) producing IL-17 (Fig. 6D) in response to subsequent challenge with B. bronchiseptica; however, the numbers of CD4+ T cells increased in response to infection with B. pertussis when comparing with the sham vaccinated (Fig. 6B), with many of those being IL-17+ (Fig. 6E). Finally, vaccination with Bbvac (red) resulted in a significant increase in the number of CD4+ IL-17+ T cells as a response to B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 6A and D), B. pertussis (Fig. 6B and E) and especially B. parapertussis (Fig. 6C and F) challenge, respectively. These data indicate that Bbvac provides good levels of cellular immunity across the 3 species, increasing the numbers of CD4+ and CD4+ IL-17+ cells very rapidly following infection. It is noteworthy that despite the generally accepted view that convalescent immunity confers the best protection, our results show that the measurable outcomes of protection conferred by convalescence can be significantly improved upon.

Extended protection conferred by Bbvac correlates with accumulation of interferon gamma-positive IL-17+ CD4+ T cells.

The above data indicate that Bbvac-induced protection involves a combination of humoral (Fig. 4 and 5) and cellular immunity (Fig. 6). Our previous data (Fig. 4) revealed that antibody titers remained relatively constant and are quickly recalled for at least 15 months postvaccination. To determine if the T cell IL-17 responses are also maintained over time, mice were vaccinated with Bbvac and, 15 months later, challenged with B. bronchiseptica, B. pertussis, or B. parapertussis. Mice were euthanized at day 7 postinoculation, and lungs were used to perform an intracellular staining to analyze the type of CD4 response produced in these mice.

As expected, uninfected control (black) and the sham PBS vaccinated control group (gray) showed no increase in numbers of CD4 nor CD4+ IL-17+ T cells 7 days following challenge with B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 7A and D), B. pertussis (Fig. 7B and E), or B. parapertussis (Fig. 7C and F). Remarkably, mice vaccinated with Bbvac exhibited significant increases in numbers of CD4+ IL-17+ T cells as a response to this brief 7-day infection. Interestingly, all the vaccinated mice challenged with either B. bronchiseptica (Fig. 7A and D), B. pertussis (Fig. 7B and E), or B. parapertussis (Fig. 7C and F) showed this increase, indicating that Bbvac induces a Th17 cellular mucosal response against the three classical Bordetella spp. that lasted for at least 15 months.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Bbvac promotes long-lasting IL-17+CD4+ T cell memory. C57BL/6J mice were vaccinated with PBS or vaccinated with Bbvac. Fifteen months postvaccination, mice were intranasally challenged with B. bronchiseptica (A and D), B. pertussis (B and E), or B. parapertussis (C and F). Mice were euthanized 7 days postinfection to enumerate and characterize the CD4+ T cells in the lungs. Two-way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple-comparison test. *, P < 0.05. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. n = 4 per strain and condition.

Overall, these results demonstrate that Bbvac confers better and more robust protection against the three classical Bordetella spp. The protection is due to a combination of cellular and humoral immunity that lasts at least 15 months. Importantly, this robust mucosal response protects against B. bronchiseptica, B. pertussis, and B. parapertussis, offering a unique vaccine that can provide cross-protection against all classical Bordetella spp.

DISCUSSION

Convalescent immunity against B. pertussis in humans has been observed to provide robust and lasting protection against the pathogen. The first-generation reactogenic whole-cell vaccines (wP) comprised of inactivated bacteria formulations also provided protection that was reasonably effective and long-lasting. It has been established that the protective responses generated in response to vaccination with the wP vaccine correlate to a Th1/Th17 response pathway, inducing both cellular and antibody-mediated protection. Not surprisingly, efforts to improve the suboptimally performing acellular vaccines currently being used in several countries aim to emulate the Th1/Th17 pathway response of a natural infection, utilizing convalescent immunity and wP vaccines as the benchmarks in protection.

Protection conferred by the attenuated B. bronchiseptica live vaccine strain, Bbvac, is also based on the convalescent immunity of a self-resolving infection (3), but the measurable aspects of protection are significantly stronger than those derived from wild-type B. bronchiseptica. As our work here and earlier have shown, the immune response to Bbvac vaccination follows a Th1/Th17 pathway, which is robustly cellular and strongly antibody based and remains significantly responsive even 15 months following vaccination. As we have reported (2, 3, 39, 50), the mechanism of this enhanced host immune response is mediated via a loss-of-function deletion which renders Bbvac unable to modulate/suppress host immune responses like its wild-type counterpart. One major consequence of this pronounced host immune response is to render Bbvac a self-limiting infection (3), unlike its wild-type counterpart, which is a persistent colonizer of the upper respiratory tract in mammals. In this respect, intranasally delivered Bbvac is cleared from the nasal cavities of mice within 2 to 3 months, while the wild type is known to persist indefinitely in the nose.

Finally, the most consequential result of the enhanced immune response of Bbvac is the remarkable cross-species host protection it confers against all 3 of the classical Bordetella species. Currently deployed animal vaccines being used to protect against B. bronchiseptica provide limited and short-lived immunity, and Bbvac is already well positioned to undergo trials as a vaccine for domestic pets and animals. Yet its unique ability to confer protection against B. pertussis and B. parapertussis (and B. bronchiseptica) raises the exciting possibility that Bbvac itself, as a live vaccine, or knowledge gained from its study, could lead to a more robust vaccine against pertussis in humans. Unlike B. pertussis BPZE1 a promising live attenuated B. pertussis vaccine candidate currently being tested (20, 21), Bbvac is an attenuated derivative of the largely commensal B. bronchiseptica, posing even less risk to humans, and can protect against diverse Bordetella species. As the number of reported cases of respiratory diseases and other opportunistic infections caused by a growing list of zoonotic and environmental bordetellae is gradually increasing, it would be prudent to examine novel platforms to address this. The new strategy of Bbvac that focuses on disrupting bacterial immunosuppressive pathways to allow the host to induce broad, robust, and long-lasting protective immunity may be a step in this direction.

Conclusions.

Whooping cough-like disease is unfortunately remerging (4, 5, 51) despite international vaccination efforts. In the manuscript, we describe a novel live attenuated vaccine, Bbvac, which profoundly outperforms the currently available vaccines, providing a combination of humoral and cellular immunity that lasts for at least 15 months in the murine model. Bbvac confers protection against at least the three classical Bordetella species, B. pertussis, B. parapertussis, and B. bronchiseptica, offering, for the first time, a vaccine candidate that confers cross-protection against several Bordetella spp. The findings demonstrate that by better understanding the molecular mechanisms that bacteria utilize to suppress the generation of adaptive protective immunity, we can develop alternative strategies for vaccine and therapeutic development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.

Wild-type Bordetella bronchiseptica strain RB50 (B. bronchiseptica) and a derivative btrS mutant (RB50ΔbtrS) (3), here called Bbvac (52), B. pertussis, and B. parapertussis were grown on plates of Difco Bordet-Gengou agar (BD; catalog no. 248200) supplemented with 20% defibrinated sheep blood from HemoStat and 20 μg/mL of streptomycin as previously described (1). For liquid cultures, B. pertussis and B. parapertussis were grown in Stainer-Scholte medium (1). B. bronchiseptica and Bbvac were grown in LB media (1). Details of the clinical strains included in this study are found in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

Animal experiments.

We obtained 5- to 7-week-old wild-type C57BL/6J mice from Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine, or our breeding colony (established from Jackson Laboratories mice). Nasal cavity, trachea, lungs, spleen, and blood were collected postmortem. When tissues were used to enumerate colonies, collection was performed in beaded tubes, and following homogenization, colonies were enumerated in Bordet-Gengou agar supplemented with 20% defibrinated sheep blood from HemoStat and 20 μg/mL of streptomycin when plating laboratory strains; no streptomycin was used when plating clinical isolates. When organs were harvested for immunological studies, they were collected in 15-mL Falcon tubes containing sterile cell culture-grade PBS. Immune staining was performed as outlined below.

To evaluate the protection conferred by Bbvac, groups of mice were intraperitoneally vaccinated with PBS, one-fifth human dose of Adacel, or intranasal PBS containing 5 × 105 Nobivac, Bbvac, or RB50. Ninety days postvaccination, mice were challenged with B. bronchiseptica, B. pertussis, or B. parapertussis. Mice were euthanized 7 days postchallenge to enumerate colonies and evaluate immune parameters. To evaluate convalescent immunity by rechallenge, nasal bacteria in primarily infected mice was eliminated by treatment with enrofloxacin (45 μg in 10 μL PBS) 2 doses daily for 5 days. Following this treatment, a control group was euthanized at day 80 to confirm clearance from the respiratory tract. The Bbvac-inoculated group was not treated (as clearance was observed by day 56), and a control group was euthanized at day 80 to confirm clearance. We collected nasal cavity, trachea, and lungs to enumerate CFU, and trachea was where we found higher dispersion due to the collection from the animals, which can render different amounts of tissue due to individual reasons.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and cytokine assays.

Serum samples were utilized to evaluate antibody titers. We coated 96-well microtiter plates (Costar) with heat-killed B. bronchiseptica, B. pertussis, and B. parapertussis as previously reported (3). Serial dilution (2-fold dilutions) of the serum samples were added to the previously coated plate and were incubated at 37°. After several washes, IgG antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen. SureBlue (SeraCare; catalog no. 5120-0076) was added to start the developing reaction, which was terminated with HCl after 3 min. The plates were read at an optical density at 450 nm (OD450). The titer was determined to be the reciprocal of the lowest dilution in which an OD of 0.1 at 450 nm was obtained (3, 43, 49, 50).

Flow cytometry.

Lungs were processed and stained as previously described (3, 44, 50). Numbers of live cells were enumerated with Countess II (Thermo Fisher) with trypan blue stain. Two million live cells were seeded in each well for staining (see Table S1). The acquisition of the data was performed using BD-LSR II (Becton, Dickinson), and analysis was done with FlowJo 10.0 following standard gating strategy (3, 44). Statistical significance was calculated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s multiple-comparison tests in GraphPad Prism (3). Briefly, our gating strategy was single cells, live cells, T cells, CD4 versus CD8, intracellular CD4+ IL-17 interferon gamma (IFN-γ).

TABLE S1

List of antibodies used for flow cytometry experiments with the BD-LSR II (Becton Dickinson). This table includes target, clone, vendor, and catalog number. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (17.3KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Ethics statement.

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Mice were bred and maintained at Paul D. Coverdell Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of Georgia, Georgia (AUP, A2016 02-010-Y2-A3). All experiments were carried out in accordance with all institutional guidelines, and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Georgia, Athens (Bordetella-host interactions AUPs, A2016 02-010-Y2-A6 and A2016 02-010-Y2-A3; breeding protocol, A2016 07-006-Y2-A5). All animals were anesthetized using 5% isoflurane and euthanized using carbon dioxide inhalation followed by cervical dislocation to minimize animal suffering. Animals were handled following institutional guidelines, in keeping with full accreditation from the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (3, 50).

Statistical analysis.

All results were graphed in GraphPad Prism (version 9.2.0), and statistical significance was calculated using two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple-comparison tests; one-way ANOVA, Brown-Forsythe test; Bartlett’s test; or Mann-Whitney as indicated in each figure. For all our experiments, we used both genders (male and female) to account for gender variability. The number of animals used per experiment varied between experiments and is detailed in each figure legend.

Data availability.

All data are available upon direct request.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

M.C.G., conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, visualization, supervision, and project administration. L.K.H., formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, visualization, supervision, and project administration. K.K.D. performed animal work and edited the manuscript. E.T.H., resources, funding, validation, writing – review and editing, supervision, and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This work was supported by the Harvill Lab start-up package and NIH funding (grant number AI122753).

We acknowledge the outstanding support of Whitney Rabacal, who has not only brainstormed but also provide critical ideas for the paper. We thank all the valuable support of several students who have been participating in several aspects of this project during their internship training, including Julie Evans undergraduate of the Harvill lab; Rachel Sanchez, who was supported by the Swanson Feline Foundation during her summer internship; and Margaret R. Dedloff, who was supported by the Clarkson University McNair Scholars Research Program during her summer internship.

We declare no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Monica C. Gestal, Email: monica.cartellegestal@lsuhs.edu, mcarges@gmail.com.

Eric T. Harvill, Email: harvill@uga.edu.

Robert A. Britton, Baylor College of Medicine

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gestal MC, Rivera I, Howard LK, Dewan KK, Soumana IH, Dedloff M, Nicholson TL, Linz B, Harvill ET. 2018. Blood or serum exposure induce global transcriptional changes, altered antigenic profile, and increased cytotoxicity by classical Bordetellae. Front Microbiol 9:1969. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gestal MC, Whitesides LT, Harvill ET. 2019. Integrated signaling pathways mediate Bordetella immunomodulation, persistence, and transmission. Trends Microbiol 27:118–130. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gestal MC, Howard LK, Dewan K, Johnson HM, Barbier M, Bryant C, Soumana IH, Rivera I, Linz B, Blas-Machado U, Harvill ET. 2019. Enhancement of immune response against Bordetella spp. by disrupting immunomodulation. Sci Rep 9:20261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56652-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Domenech de Cellès M, Magpantay FM, King AA, Rohani P. 2016. The pertussis enigma: reconciling epidemiology, immunology and evolution. Proc Biol Sci 283:20152309. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jackson DW, Rohani P. 2014. Perplexities of pertussis: recent global epidemiological trends and their potential causes. Epidemiol Infect 142:672–684. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812003093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rohani P, Drake JM. 2011. The decline and resurgence of pertussis in the US. Epidemics 3:183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dewan KK, Linz B, DeRocco SE, Harvill ET. 2020. Acellular pertussis vaccine components: today and tomorrow. Vaccines (Basel) 8:217. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kapil P, Merkel TJ. 2019. Pertussis vaccines and protective immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 59:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2019.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Damron FH, Barbier M, Dubey P, Edwards KM, Gu X-X, Klein NP, Lu K, Mills KHG, Pasetti MF, Read RC, Rohani P, Sebo P, Harvill ET. 2020. Overcoming waning immunity in pertussis vaccines: workshop of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. J Immunol 205:877–882. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Varney ME, Boehm DT, DeRoos K, Nowak ES, Wong TY, Sen-Kilic E, Bradford SD, Elkins C, Epperly MS, Witt WT, Barbier M, Damron FH. 2018. Bordetella pertussis whole cell immunization, unlike acellular immunization, mimics naïve infection by driving hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell expansion in mice. Front Immunol 9:2376. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Burdin N, Handy LK, Plotkin SA. 2017. What is wrong with pertussis vaccine immunity? The problem of waning effectiveness of pertussis vaccines. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 9:a029454. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ma L, Caulfield A, Dewan KK, Harvill ET. 2021. Pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis, vaccine-driven evolution, and reemergence of pertussis. Emerg Infect Dis 27:1561–1566. doi: 10.3201/eid2706.203850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carriquiriborde F, Regidor V, Aispuro PM, Magali G, Bartel E, Bottero D, Hozbor D. 2019. Rare detection of Bordetella pertussis pertactin-deficient strains in Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis 25:2048–2054. doi: 10.3201/eid2511.190329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bouchez V, Hegerle N, Strati F, Njamkepo E, Guiso N. 2015. New data on vaccine antigen deficient Bordetella pertussis isolates. Vaccines (Basel) 3:751–770. doi: 10.3390/vaccines3030751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yeung KHT, Duclos P, Nelson EAS, Hutubessy RCW. 2017. An update of the global burden of pertussis in children younger than 5 years: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis 17:974–980. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30390-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wolf MA, Boehm DT, DeJong MA, Wong TY, Sen-Kilic E, Hall JM, Blackwood CB, Weaver KL, Kelly CO, Kisamore CA, Bitzer GJ, Bevere JR, Barbier M, Damron FH. 2021. Intranasal immunization with acellular pertussis vaccines results in long-term immunity to Bordetella pertussis in mice. Infect Immun 89:e00607-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00607-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dubois V, Chatagnon J, Thiriard A, Bauderlique-Le Roy H, Debrie A-S, Coutte L, Locht C. 2021. Suppression of mucosal Th17 memory responses by acellular pertussis vaccines enhances nasal Bordetella pertussis carriage. NPJ Vaccines 6:6. doi: 10.1038/s41541-020-00270-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Locht C. 2021. Is there a potential for novel, nasal pertussis vaccines? Expert Rev Vaccines 20:415–423. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1899823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Locht C. 2021. The path to new pediatric vaccines against pertussis. Vaccines (Basel) 9:228. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Solans L, Debrie AS, Coutte L, Locht C. 2021. Construction and evaluation of a pertactin-deficient live attenuated pertussis vaccine candidate B. pertussisZE1 derivative. Vaccine 39:2843–2849. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Debrie A-S, Coutte L, Raze D, Mooi F, Alexander F, Gorringe A, Mielcarek N, Locht C. 2018. Construction and evaluation of Bordetella pertussis live attenuated vaccine strain B. pertussisZE1 producing Fim3. Vaccine 36:1345–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elizagaray ML, Gomes MTR, Guimaraes ES, Rumbo M, Hozbor DF, Oliveira SC, Moreno G. 2020. Canonical and non-canonical inflammasome activation by outer membrane vesicles derived from Bordetella pertussis. Front Immunol 11:1879. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zurita ME, Wilk MM, Carriquiriborde F, Bartel E, Moreno G, Misiak A, Mills KHG, Hozbor D. 2019. A pertussis outer membrane vesicle-based vaccine induces lung-resident memory CD4 T cells and protection against Bordetella pertussis, including pertactin deficient strains. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:125. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bottero D, Zurita ME, Gaillard ME, Bartel E, Vercellini C, Hozbor D. 2018. Membrane vesicles derived from Bordetella bronchiseptica: active constituent of a new vaccine against infections caused by this pathogen. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01877-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01877-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gore T, Headley M, Laris R, Bergman JGHE, Sutton D, Horspool LJI, Jacobs AAC. 2005. Intranasal kennel cough vaccine protecting dogs from experimental Bordetella bronchiseptica challenge within 72 hours. Vet Rec 156:482–483. doi: 10.1136/vr.156.15.482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shade FJ, Goodnow RA. 1979. Intranasal immunization of dogs against Bordetella bronchiseptica-induced tracheobronchitis (kennel cough) with modified live-Bordetella bronchiseptica vaccine. Am J Vet Res 40:1241–1243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Appel M, Bemis DA. 1978. The canine contagious respiratory disease complex (kennel cough). Cornell Vet 68 Suppl 7:70–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McCandlish IA, Thompson H, Cornwell HJ, Wright NG. 1978. A study of dogs with kennel cough. Vet Rec 102:293–301. doi: 10.1136/vr.102.14.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bemis DA, Carmichael LE, Appel MJ. 1977. Naturally occurring respiratory disease in a kennel caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica. Cornell Vet 67:282–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McCandlish IA, Thompson H, Wright NG. 1976. Kennel cough: vaccination against Bordetella bronchiseptica infection. Vet Rec 98:156–157. doi: 10.1136/vr.98.8.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.El Garch F, de Jong A, Simjee S, Moyaert H, Klein U, Ludwig C, Marion H, Haag-Diergarten S, Richard-Mazet A, Thomas V, Siegwart E. 2016. Monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of respiratory tract pathogens isolated from diseased cattle and pigs across Europe, 2009–2012: vetPath results. Vet Microbiol 194:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kureljušić B, Weissenbacher-Lang C, Nedorost N, Stixenberger D, Weissenböck H. 2016. Association between Pneumocystis spp. and co-infections with Bordetella bronchiseptica, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida in Austrian pigs with pneumonia. Vet J 207:177–179. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Register KB, Ivanov YV, Harvill ET, Davison N, Foster G. 2015. Novel, host-restricted genotypes of Bordetella bronchiseptica associated with phocine respiratory tract isolates. Microbiology (Reading) 161:580–592. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kumar S, Singh BR, Bhardwaj M, Singh V. 2014. Occurrence of Bordetella infection in pigs in northern India. Int J Microbiol 2014:238575. doi: 10.1155/2014/238575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao Z, Wang C, Xue Y, Tang X, Wu B, Cheng X, He Q, Chen H. 2011. The occurrence of Bordetella bronchiseptica in pigs with clinical respiratory disease. Vet J 188:337–340. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Akkermans JP. 1991. Changed health problems in a changing pig-farming concern in The Netherlands until 1980. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 116:1168–1174. (In Dutch.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.de Jong MF. 1991. Atrophic rhinitis A.D. 1991. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 116:1221–1230. (In Dutch.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sukumar N, Sloan GP, Conover MS, Love CF, Mattoo S, Kock ND, Deora R. 2010. Cross-species protection mediated by a Bordetella bronchiseptica strain lacking antigenic homologs present in acellular pertussis vaccines. Infect Immun 78:2008–2016. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01142-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gestal MC, Johnson HM, Harvill ET. 2019. Immunomodulation as a novel strategy for prevention and treatment of Bordetella spp. infections. Front Immunol 10:2869. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Harvill ET, Cotter PA, Miller JF. 1999. Pregenomic comparative analysis between bordetella bronchiseptica RB50 and Bordetella pertussis tohama I in murine models of respiratory tract infection. Infect Immun 67:6109–6118. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.11.6109-6118.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Warfel JM, Zimmerman LI, Merkel TJ. 2016. Comparison of three whole-cell pertussis vaccines in the baboon model of pertussis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 23:47–54. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00449-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Warfel JM, Zimmerman LI, Merkel TJ. 2014. Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:787–792. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314688110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Miura K, Orcutt AC, Muratova OV, Miller LH, Saul A, Long CA. 2008. Development and characterization of a standardized ELISA including a reference serum on each plate to detect antibodies induced by experimental malaria vaccines. Vaccine 26:193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cossarizza A, Chang H-D, Radbruch A, Akdis M, Andrä I, Annunziato F, Bacher P, Barnaba V, Battistini L, Bauer WM, Baumgart S, Becher B, Beisker W, Berek C, Blanco A, Borsellino G, Boulais PE, Brinkman RR, Büscher M, Busch DH, Bushnell TP, Cao X, Cavani A, Chattopadhyay PK, Cheng Q, Chow S, Clerici M, Cooke A, Cosma A, Cosmi L, Cumano A, Dang VD, Davies D, De Biasi S, Del Zotto G, Della Bella S, Dellabona P, Deniz G, Dessing M, Diefenbach A, Di Santo J, Dieli F, Dolf A, Donnenberg VS, Dörner T, Ehrhardt GRA, Endl E, Engel P, Engelhardt B, Esser C, et al. 2017. Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies. Eur J Immunol 47:1584–1797. doi: 10.1002/eji.201646632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Friedman LE, Messina MT, Santoferrara L, Santillán MA, Mangano A, Franco MA. 2006. Characterization of Bordetella bronchiseptica strains using phenotypic and genotypic markers. Vet Microbiol 117:313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Koepke R, Eickhoff JC, Ayele RA, Petit AB, Schauer SL, Hopfensperger DJ, Conway JH, Davis JP. 2014. Estimating the effectiveness of tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) for preventing pertussis: evidence of rapidly waning immunity and difference in effectiveness by Tdap brand. J Infect Dis 210:942–953. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.van der Lee S, Hendrikx LH, Sanders EAM, Berbers GAM, Buisman AM. 2018. Whole-cell or acellular pertussis primary immunizations in infancy determines adolescent cellular immune profiles. Front Immunol 9:51. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Valentini D, Ferrara G, Advani R, Hallander HO, Maeurer MJ. 2015. Serum reactome induced by Bordetella pertussis infection and pertussis vaccines: qualitative differences in serum antibody recognition patterns revealed by peptide microarray analysis. BMC Immunol 16:40. doi: 10.1186/s12865-015-0090-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Soumana IH, Linz B, Dewan KK, Sarr D, Gestal MC, Howard LK, Caulfield AD, Rada B, Harvill ET. 2021. Modeling immune evasion and vaccine limitations by targeted nasopharyngeal Bordetella pertussis inoculation in mice. Emerg Infect Dis 27:2107–2116. doi: 10.3201/eid2708.203566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gestal MC, Blas-Machado U, Johnson HM, Rubin LN, Dewan KK, Bryant C, Tiemeyer M, Harvill ET. 2020. Disrupting Bordetella immunosuppression reveals a role for eosinophils in coordinating the adaptive immune response in the respiratory tract. Microorganisms 8:1808. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fullen AR, Yount KS, Dubey P, Deora R. 2020. Whoop! There it is: the surprising resurgence of pertussis. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008625. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Harvill ET, Gestal MC. July 2020. Bordetella vaccine. US patent application 16/647,740.
  • 53.Mielcarek N, Debrie A-S, Raze D, Bertout J, Rouanet C, Younes AB, Creusy C, Engle J, Goldman WE, Locht C. 2006. Live attenuated B. pertussis as a single-dose nasal vaccine against whooping cough. PLoS Pathog 2:e65. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ellis JA. 2015. How well do vaccines for Bordetella bronchiseptica work in dogs? A critical review of the literature 1977–2014. Vet J 204:5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

Bbvac confers better protection against B. pertussis than convalescence immunity. C57BL/6J mice were intranasally inoculated with PBS (black) or PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. bronchiseptica (blue), B. pertussis (purple), or Bbvac (red). The other group was intraperitoneally vaccinated with 1/5 of Adacel (green) and boosted 14 days later. Ninety days postinoculation/vaccination, mice were intranasally challenged with PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of B. pertussis. Mice were euthanized 7 days postinoculation, and colonies were enumerated in the respiratory tract. n = 4 per condition. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.9 MB (2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Bbvac confers robust protection against clinical isolates of B. bronchiseptica. C57BL/6J mice were vaccinated with PBS (black) or PBS containing 5 × 105 CFU of Bbvac (red). Ninety days later, mice were intranasally challenged with PBS containing 5 × 105 of a clinical isolate of B. bronchiseptica (a total of 12 different clinical isolates were tested). Mice were euthanized at day 7 postinfection, and colonies were enumerated in the respiratory tract. Two-way ANOVA was performed. **, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. n = 4 mice per strain and condition. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.4 MB (393.8KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Clinical isolates included in this study. List of clinical Bordetella spp. strains utilized to determine protection levels conferred by Bbvac. This table indicates if the strains were used to test protection at 3 months, 7 months, or both. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (17.2KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Bbvac generates more diverse a-Bordetellae antibodies. C57BL/6J mice were vaccinated with different commercially available vaccines and challenged with B. bronchiseptica or B. pertussis, vaccinated with Bbvac, or unvaccinated. Three months after vaccination, serum was collected and used as primary antibody for Western blot analysis. All the sections of the membrane were incubated together with the secondary antibody to promote binding competition (for each figure separately). We developed each panel to compare intensity. The results show the IgG antibody profile generated in mice against B. bronchiseptica (A) and B. pertussis (B). n = 3. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.9 MB (2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

List of antibodies used for flow cytometry experiments with the BD-LSR II (Becton Dickinson). This table includes target, clone, vendor, and catalog number. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (17.3KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Gestal et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available upon direct request.


Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES