Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 3;2022:4119345. doi: 10.1155/2022/4119345

Table 2.

Relative effects and its 95% credible interval of all pairwise panels for sensitivity based on Bayesian network meta-analysis method.

A B C D E H I K M
A 1
B 15.55 (1.8-159.59) 1
C 9.88 (1.09-93.44) 0.63 (0.24-1.56) 1
D 7.87 (0.88-77.78) 0.51 (0.18-1.33) 0.8 (0.29-2.11) 1
E 14.87 (1.65-154.2) 0.96 (0.35-2.56) 1.52 (0.59-4.03) 1.89 (0.69-5.49) 1
H 4.81 (0.32-77.45) 0.31 (0.05-2.11) 0.49 (0.07-3.3) 0.61 (0.09-4.61) 0.32 (0.05-2.3) 1
I 5.78 (0.38-96.46) 0.36 (0.05-2.74) 0.58 (0.09-4.18) 0.72 (0.1-5.68) 0.38 (0.05-2.82) 1.19 (0.09-15.06) 1
K 2.53 (0.15-44.93) 0.16 (0.02-1.2) 0.25 (0.03-1.89) 0.32 (0.04-2.5) 0.17 (0.02-1.34) 0.52 (0.04-7.33) 0.44 (0.03-5.73) 1
M 11.61 (1.49-102.5) 0.74 (0.34-1.58) 1.17 (0.57-2.44) 1.46 (0.61-3.61) 0.77 (0.33-1.82) 2.39 (0.4-14.24) 2.01 (0.33-12.07) 4.59 (0.7-30.51) 1

A: MMP-9/TIMP-1; B: M-CSF+CA15; C: VEGF + CA 15-3; D: VEGF + M-CSF + CA 15-3; E: VEGF+ M-CSF; H: CA 15.3 + IL-18; I: MSA + B2m; K: TF1+TF2+TF3; M: mammography.