Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 23;13:1014. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28546-8

Fig. 3. Forest plots of each of the comparison groups.

Fig. 3

The left-hand label displays the mean HR, the 95% confidence interval (CI), the P value, and the Δ HR. The Δ HR measure is the difference of the current HR estimate and the baseline, structured, HR estimate. For surgery vs. active monitoring and radiation vs. active monitoring for prostate cancer, we have included the exact results from the RCT in red for comparison. For the remaining cohorts, clinical expertise suggests equipoise between the treatments. We see that the inclusion of our potential confounders shift the HR point estimate in the direction of the RCT and reduces the selection bias. The blue labels below each graph indicate which treatment is better in terms of HR comparison. We display the HR comparisons for each cohort as follows: a surgery vs. radiation for prostate cancer; b surgery vs. monitoring for prostate cancer; c surgery vs. monitoring for prostate cancer; d surgery vs. radiation for NSCLC. For (d), “Radiation better" is not displayed because the HR value is not shifted beyond 1.0, the direction of radiation better.