Table 2.
Comparison of optical transmittance and EMI shielding performance of transparent EMI shielding films
| Materials | Substrate | T (%) | SE (dB) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITO | Glass | 81.5 | ~ 18 | [10] |
| Al-ZnO | Glass | 85.93 | 6.5 | [46] |
| Ga-ZnO | Glass | 70 | 47.4 | [47] |
| Monolayer graphene | PET | 97.7 | 2.27 | [18] |
| Multilayer graphene | PET | 84.7 | 14.73 | [48] |
| rGO | PEI | 62 | 6.37 | [49] |
| MXene | Glass | 45 | 10 | [50] |
| PES/Ag NW | PET | 70 | 38 | [11] |
| CA/Ag NW | PU | 73 | 36.5 | [7] |
| Ag NW | PDMS | 76.8 | 42.5 | [12] |
| Fe3O4/Ag NW | PET | 90 | 24.9 | [13] |
| Graphene/Ag NW | Glass | 78.4 | 26 | [51] |
| Ag NW/MXene | PET | 83 | ~ 30 | [16] |
| Ag NW/MXene/PVA | PC | 52.3 | 32 | [22] |
| Ag NW/PEDOT: PSS | Glass | 81.1 | 41.4 | [52] |
| rGO/Ag NW | PET | 86.8 | 18.38 | This work |
| 84.2 | 24.38 | |||
| 81.9 | 33.62 |
PEI: poly (ethylene imine); PES: poly (ethersulfones); CA: calcium alginate; PU: polyurethane; PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; PC: polycarbonate