Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 10;12:764843. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.764843

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Phenotypes of wild-types and CRISPR transgenic plants with C. campestris infestation. (A) Wild-type M82 tomatoes and T1 SlPR1 CRISPR transgenic plants with C. campestris infestation. (B) Wild-type M82 tomatoes and T1 SlNLR CRISPR transgenic plants with C. campestris infestation. (C) Plant height of wild-type H1706 tomatoes and CRISPR transgenic plants with C. campestris infestation. The plant height of host tomato plants was measured in centimeters (cm). Data presented are assessed using one-tailed t-test with wild-type M82 as control. “*p-value < 0.05. SlPR1 CRISPR transgenic T1 plants #1-3 were used for control (-Cc) and T1 plants #4-6 were used for Cuscuta infestation treatments (+ Cc). SlNLR CRISPR transgenic T1 plants #1, 5, 9 were used for control (–Cc) and T1 plants #2, 4, 6, 8, 10 were used for Cuscuta infestation treatments (+ Cc). Detailed genotyping results of the T1 CRISPR transgenic plants are listed in Supplementary Table 12.