Table 7.
Sensitivity Analyses for the DDD estimates.
| Outcomes | (1) Women with partial exposure to free secondary considered unexposed |
(2) Women with partial exposure to free secondary considered fully exposed |
(3) Controlling for women’s partial exposure to free secondary policy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy Effect (95% CI a) |
Policy Effect (95% CI a) |
Policy Effect (95% CI a) |
|
| Panel A | |||
| IPVAW justified under at least one circumstance | −4.24 (−10.28, 1.80) |
−6.15** (−11.90, −0.40) |
−6.10** (−11.92, −0.27) |
| IPVAW justified scale (Range 0 to 5) | −0.13 (−0.31, 0.50) |
−0.21** (−0.39, −0.03) |
−0.20** (−0.37, −0.03) |
| Panel B | |||
| Circumstances under which IPVAW justified: | |||
| (a) goes out without telling the husband | −3.50* (−7.58, 0.56) |
−4.88** (−9.06, −0.69) |
−4.86** (−8.76, −0.97) |
| (b) neglects children | −2.98 (−8.17, 2.21) |
−4.99* (−10.03, 0.05) |
−4.62* (−9.69, 0.44) |
| (c) argues with husband | −2.85 (−6.51, 0.81) |
−4.41** (−7.78, −1.04) |
−4.27** (−7.74, −0.81) |
| (d) refuses sex | −2.30* (−4.87, 2.78) |
−4.31** (−6.84, −1.78) |
−4.10*** (−6.50, −1.70) |
| (e) burns food | −1.15 (−4.28, 1.98) |
−2.49 (−5.77, 0.79) |
−2.21 (−5.47, 1.05) |
| Sample Size (N) | 714,486 | 714,486 | 714,486 |
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.10. All models control for rural/urban residence, respondent’s age, and sex of the household head.
a
95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Standard errors are clustered at the country level.