Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 18;14(1):15–22. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2022.113546

Table 2.

Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for metastasis-free survival in 186 patients treated with EBRT combined with BT boost and ADT for localized prostate cancer

Level Parameter estimate HR (95% CI) p-value
Patient age (years) –0.010 0.99 (0.93-1.06) 0.752
BT fractions 1 vs. 2 0.232 1.26 (0.46-3.44) 0.650
ECOG 1 vs. 0 0.833 2.30 (0.29-17.94) 0.427
Nodal irradiation Yes vs. No 0.059 1.06 (0.36-3.11) 0.914
TNM > T1c vs. T1c 1.267 3.55 (0.84-15.02) 0.085
Gleason grade group 3/4 vs. 1/2 0.439 1.55 (0.45-5.32) 0.484
5 vs. 1/2 1.529 4.61 (1.81-11.73) 0.001
BED (Gy) –0.007 0.99 (0.96-1.02) 0.618
Maximum PSA (ng/ml) –0.009 0.99 (0.97-1.01) 0.388
nPSA (10 ng/ml) 0.087 1.09 (1.05-1.13) < 0.001
Time to nPSA (days) 0.0002 1.00 (0.99-1.00) 0.701
Adjuvant ADT Yes vs. No 0.0556 1.06 (0.45-2.46) 0.897
ADT duration (months) –0.053 0.94 (0.80-1.11) 0.524
TURP Yes vs. No 0.495 1.64 (0.22-12.14) 0.628
PSA bounce (time-varying) Yes vs. No –1.505 0.20 (0.03-1.65) 0.142

BT – brachytherapy; ECOG – the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score; Gleason grade group – International Society of Urological Pathology 2014 grade group system; BED – biologically effective dose; nPSA – PSA nadir; ADT – androgen deprivation therapy; TURP – transurethral resection of the prostate