Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Proc ACM Symp User Interface Softw Tech. 2021 Oct 12;2021:1122–1143. doi: 10.1145/3472749.3474811

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

σ2 vs. ID regression for 6 variance models on the Zhou and Ren’s circular tunnel dataset. As shown, the quadratic-variance model (Model #4 in Table 1) accounts for 84.4% of variance in the observed variance of MT. It performs the best according to AIC, WAIC, and leave-one-(A, W)-out cross-validation. The R2 value of Model #6 in Table 1 is the same with Model #4, but Model #6 overfits the data because it has higher RMSE in leave-one-(A, W)-out cross-validation compared with quadratic variance model.