7.2. Analysis.

Comparison 7: Effect of discharge planning on place of discharge, Outcome 2: Discharge destination, studies recruiting people with a medical or surgical condition

Discharge destination, studies recruiting people with a medical or surgical condition
Study	Place of discharge	Notes
Evans 1993	Discharged to home: T = 330/417 (79%), C = 305/418 (73%) P = 0.04 difference 6%; 95% CI 0.39% to 12% Home at 9 months: T = 259/417 (62%), C = 225/418 (54%) P = 0.01 difference 8.3%; 95% CI 1.6% to 15%	—
Hendriksen 1990	Discharged to nursing home: T = 0/135 (0%), C = 3/138 (2%) Difference − 2%; 95% CI − 4.6% to 0.26% At 6 months: admitted to another institution T = 3/135 (2%), C = 14/138 (10%) Difference ‐8%; 95% CI − 13.5% to − 2.3%	—