Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Mar;122(3):493–522. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000399

Table A2.

Parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals of the cross-effects in the continuous time models for the within-person relations between the Big Five personality traits and self-rated health and general disease level in the LISS sample.

Pt -> Ht+1 Ht -> Pt+1 Model fit statistics Model comparison statistics
Variable & Model Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI −2LL df AIC ΔLL Δdf p-value
N & SRH
Baseline Model −.10 [−.18, −.03] −.13 [−.18, −.08] 215015.3 97058 20899.32
Model A 0 - −.11 [−.16, −.06] 215022.4 97059 20904.45 7.12 1 .008
Model B −.04 [−.12, .03] 0 - 215042.7 97059 20924.71 27.38 1 < .001
E & SRH
Baseline Model .23 [.14, .33] .12 [.07, .17] 212067.0 97058 17950.97
Model A 0 - .08 [.04, .13] 212089.8 97059 17971.82 22.85 1 < .001
Model B .16 [.07, .26] 0 - 212090.4 97059 17972.41 23.44 1 < .001
O & SRH
Baseline Model .21 [.11, .31] .12 [.06, .18] 216509.4 97058 22393.41
Model A 0 - .09 [.03, .15] 216526.6 97059 22408.55 17.14 1 < .001
Model B .16 [.06, .25] 0 - 216524.9 97059 22406.94 15.53 1 < .001
C & SRH
Baseline Model .08 [−.01, .17] .11 [.05, .17] 217448.2 97058 23332.22
Model A 0 - .09 [.04, .15] 217451.3 97059 23333.27 3.05 1 .081
Model B .03 [−.05, .12] 0 - 217461.6 97059 23343.60 13.38 1 < .001
A & SRH
Baseline Model .05 [−.03, .14] 0 [−.06, .06] 219151.1 97058 25035.13
Model A 0 - −.01 [−.07, .05] 219152.5 97059 25034.50 1.37 1 .242
Model B .05 [−.03, .14] 0 - 219151.1 97059 25033.13 0 1 .998
N & GDL
Baseline Model −.05 [−.09, −.01] −.02 [−.06, .02] 197284.4 95045 7194.36
Model A 0 - 0 [−.03, .03] 197289.8 95046 7197.77 5.40 1 .020
Model B −.04 [−.069, −.001] 0 - 197285.5 95046 7193.48 1.11 1 .292
E & GDL
Baseline Model −.05 [−.09, 0] −.05 [−.09, −.02] 193233.4 95045 3143.45
Model A 0 - −.04 [−.07, −.01] 193237.3 95046 3145.27 3.82 1 .051
Model B −.01 [−.05, .03] 0 - 193242.6 95046 3150.60 9.16 1 .002
O & GDL
Baseline Model −.07 [−.11, −.02] −.05 [−.090, −.002] 197544.3 95045 7454.32
Model A 0 - −.02 [−.06, .02] 197552.0 95046 7459.98 7.66 1 .006
Model B −.04 [−.086, −.002] 0 - 197548.5 95046 7456.51 4.19 1 .041
C & GDL
Baseline Model −.02 [−.06, .02] .01 [−.03, .05] 198537.3 95045 8447.34
Model A 0 - .02 [−.02, .06] 198538.2 95046 8446.16 .83 1 .364
Model B −.03 [−.06, .01] 0 - 198537.5 95046 8445.53 .19 1 .660
A & GDL
Baseline Model .01 [−.04, .05] 0 [−.05, .05] 200119.9 95045 10029.86
Model A 0 - 0 [−.05, .04] 200119.9 95046 10027.95 .09 1 .768
Model B .01 [−.03, .04] 0 - 200119.9 95046 10027.86 0 1 .979

Note. In baseline models, the cross-effects of personality traits on health outcomes and the cross-effects of health outcomes on personality traits were allowed for free estimation. In Model A, the cross-effects of personality traits on health outcomes were constrained to zero. In Model B, the cross-effects of health outcomes on personality traits were constrained to zero. Model comparisons were made for Baseline Model vs. Model A and Baseline Model vs. Model B. N = neuroticism; E = extraversion; O = openness; C = conscientiousness; A = agreeableness; SRH = self-rated health; GDL = general disease level; LL = Log Likelihood; AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion; df = degrees of freedom.