Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 11;8(2):e46. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.13

Table 1.

Summary table of studies included in the present comparison

Reference Location Sample selection Sample size (women/men) Mean age (s.d./range) BDI-II translation Cronbach's alpha BDI-II total scores
0–13 14–19 20–28 29–63
NFBC,1966 Finland Cohort study 5860 (3284/2576) 46.6 (0.6) Finnish 0.92 4794 (82.0%) 594 (10.0%) 401 (4.1%) 71 (1.2%)
Aasen, 200114 Norway Randomly recruited by telephone register 875 (512/363) 44.5 (18.0–86.0) Norwegian 0.91 711 (81.0%) 93 (10.6%) 52 (6.0%) 21 (2.4%)
García-Batista et al, 201812 Dominican Republic Convenience sample from the general public 954 (438/516) 31.6 (16.0) Spanish 0.89 726 (76.1%) 102 (10.7%) 90 (9.4%) 36 (3.8%)
Gomes-Oliveira et al, 201215 Brazil Community-dwelling adults, population-based household survey 182 (102/80) 41.0 (10.8) Brazilian Portuguese 0.93 NA NA NA NA
González et al, 201516 Mexico Community sample 205 (117/88) 29.9 (16.0–70.0) Spanish 0.87 160 (78%) 27 (13%) 10 (5%) 8 (4%)
Kojima et al, 200217 Japan General population recruited from annual communal health check-up visit 766 (303/463) 50.0 (8.6) Japanese 0.87 618 (80.7%) 99 (12.9%) 37 (4.8%) 12 (1.6%)

BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II; NFBC, Northern Finland Birth Cohort.