Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;9(1):ENEURO.0244-21.2022. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0244-21.2022

Table 1.

Electro/magneto-encephalography (EEG/MEG) experiments investigating oscillations phase-amplitude tradeoffs on behavioral performance in human

Study Method Frequency
band
Frequency Oscillatory activity Modality Behavioral measure Main results
Studies using TMS
 Visual modality
  Current study EEG α 10 Hz Spontaneous Visual Near-threshold TMS-induced phosphene perception Phase-amplitude effect on detection, stronger for high amplitude
 Other modalities
  Hussain et al. (2019) EEG α, β 8–12 Hz, 13–30 Hz Spontaneous Motor Supra-threshold TMS-induced MEP Optimal phase (leading to increased MEP) reverses between low-α and high-α amplitude; no phase-amplitude effect for β
  Madsen et al. (2019) EEG α 7–13 Hz Spontaneous Motor Supra-threshold TMS-induced MEP No phase-amplitude effect on MEP amplitude
Studies not using TMS
 Visual modality
  Alexander et al. (2020) EEG α 5.6–14.4 Hz Spontaneous Visual Detection of near-threshold stimulus through eyes closed Phase effect on detection for high amplitude
  Bonnefond and Jensen (2015) MEG α 9–12 Hz Stimulus-locked (retention interval) Visual Sternberg working memory task with supra-threshold stimuli Phase effect on γ power for high amplitude
  Busch and VanRullen (2010) EEG θ 7 Hz Spontaneous (amplitude attentionally modulated) Visual Detection of spatially attended or unattended near-threshold visual stimulus Phase effect on detection and GFP for low amplitude
  Harris et al. (2018) EEG θ, α 5 Hz,
11–15 Hz
Stimulus-locked (α amplitude attentionally modulated) Visual Detection of spatially attended or unattended near-threshold visual stimulus No phase-amplitude effect on detection
  Kizuk and Mathewson (2017) EEG α 12 Hz Entrained Visual Detection of spatially attended or unattended metacontrast masked stimulus (75% performance) Tendency for phase-amplitude effect on detection, stronger for high amplitude
  Mathewson et al. (2009) EEG α 10 Hz Stimulus-locked Visual Detection of metacontrast masked stimulus (70% performance) Phase effect on detection for high amplitude
  Milton and Pleydell-Pearce (2016) EEG α 7.8–12.7 Hz Spontaneous (amplitude attentionally modulated) Visual Simultaneity judgement of spatially attended or unattended stimulus (50% performance) No phase-amplitude effect on simultaneity judgement
 Other modalities
  Ai and Ro (2014) EEG α 8–12 Hz Spontaneous Somatosensory Detection of near-threshold stimulus Phase effect on detection for high amplitude
  Herrmann et al. (2016) MEG δ 2 Hz Entrained Auditory Detection of near-threshold stimulus Phase effect on detection for high amplitude
  Ng et al. (2012) EEG θ, α 2–6 Hz,
8–12 Hz
Entrained Auditory Detection of near-threshold stimulus θ Phase-amplitude effect on detection, stronger for high amplitude; no phase-amplitude effect for α
  Spitzer et al. (2016) EEG δ, θ, and α 3 Hz,
6.7 Hz,
11 Hz
Stimulus-locked Visual, auditory, and somatosensory Two-interval numerosity comparison task (80% performance) δ Phase-amplitude effect on choice-predictive signals, stronger for high amplitude; no phase-amplitude effect for θ and α
  Zoefel and Heil (2013) EEG δ 0.5 Hz Entrained and spontaneous Auditory Detection of near-threshold stimulus No phase-amplitude effect on detection neither for entrained nor for spontaneous oscillations

Note that studies independently investigating the phase and the amplitude of oscillations were not included in this table. We only selected studies specifically investigating the interaction between the instantaneous phase and the amplitude on behavioral performance. Entrained oscillations: oscillations with a nonrandom phase distribution induced by a repetitive stimulus presentation. Stimulus-locked oscillations: oscillations with a nonrandom phase distribution induced by a single stimulus. Spontaneous oscillations: oscillations with a random phase distribution. GFP, global field power; MEP, motor-evoked potential; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation.