Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 28;11(2):254. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020254

Table 5.

Experimental validation of optimal conditions obtained with response surface methodology.

Sample A: Temperature [°C] B: Time
[min]
C: Solvent/Plant Ratio
[g/g]
TP
[mg GAE 1/g DW 2]
DPPH
[μM TE 3/g DW]
Ellagic Acid
[mg/100 g DW]
Ellagic Acid
[mg/100 g Extract]
Predicted responses
Opt1-pred 1 85 0.01 100.45 1 35 45.28 772.59 151.56 2.96
Opt2-pred 1 85 0.94 147.00 −0.92 15.76 39.69 1125.64 114.48 5.07
Experimentally obtained responses
Opt1 1 85 0.01 100.45 1 35 44.77 ± 1.76 c 707.25 ± 2.87 b 147.02 ± 7.18 c 2.98 ± 0.13 b
Opt2 1 85 0.94 147.00 −0.92 15.76 40.16 ± 1.90 b 995.18 ± 32.08 c 117.94 ± 5.93 b 5.21 ± 0.17 d
Opt3 * 95 240 10 37.97 ± 0.60 b 679.97 ± 27.45 b 115.62 ± 4.41 b 7.93 ± 0.15 e
ETOH 80% 60 60 20 20.67 ± 0.73 a 197.78 ± 2.76 a 45.23 ± 0.88 a 1.37 ± 0.03 a
2M HCl in MEOH 85 150 170 37.33 ± 1.46 b 4128 ± 35.91 d 1031.41 ± 20.73 d 4.34 ± 0.09 c

1 Galic acid equivalent; 2 Trolox equivalent; 3 Dry weight of defatted raspberry seeds; Nd—not determined. Experimental results are presented as mean values ± sd (n = 3) followed by different letters which within the same row represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) according to post hoc Tukey’s HSD test. * NADES extract obtained with a set of conditions out of experimental domain in optimization step.